Complex numbers: don't understand graph of 1/z

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around understanding how to graph the function 1/z, where z is a complex number expressed as x + iy. After multiplying by the complex conjugate, the expression simplifies to (x - iy)/(x^2 + y^2). Participants highlight the complexity of graphing this function, suggesting that a full representation requires a four-dimensional graph or two separate 3D graphs for the real and imaginary parts. There is some confusion regarding the interpretation of the graph, particularly in terms of what is being plotted and the meaning of "whole number." Clarification on these points is needed for a more accurate understanding of the graphing process.
james5
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
1/z is 1/(x+iy)

however, i then multiply by the complex conjugate and get:

(x-iy)/(x^2+y^2)

now, how do i graph this?

thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What are you trying to graph? x versus y or what?
 
To fully graph it, you would need a 4-dimensional graph, with axes x,y,a,b, so that x+y\imath=\frac{1}{a+b\imath}.
You could have 2 3-D graphs, z=\Re\left({\frac{1}{x+y\imath}}\right) and z=\Im\left({\frac{1}{x+y\imath}}\right).
 
well, i think it's not that complex since the graph i made that is correct is just one that goes down diagonally... so, it's basically the graph of x-iy since x^2 and y^2 are basically a whole number...
 
james5 said:
well, i think it's not that complex since the graph i made that is correct is just one that goes down diagonally... so, it's basically the graph of x-iy since x^2 and y^2 are basically a whole number...

Perhaps it would be better if you explain what you are talking about! What do you mean by "basically a whole number"? And, as you were asked before, what exactly are you graphing?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top