Complex Numbers: Solving 2^(8n)exp^(2niπ)=2^(8n)

  • Thread starter Thread starter craig100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex
AI Thread Summary
The equation 2^(8n)exp(2niπ) = 2^(8n) implies that exp(2niπ) = 1, which is derived from the exponential form e^(2πi) = 1. This is confirmed by the fact that e^(2nπi) simplifies to cos(2nπ) + i sin(2nπ), resulting in 1 due to the periodic nature of the cosine and sine functions. The discussion also touches on the polar form of complex numbers, where e^(iθ) can be visualized as a vector with a length of 1 rotated by angle θ. The relationship between e^(iπ) = -1 and e^(2iπ) = 1 is highlighted, demonstrating the connection between these identities. Overall, the problem illustrates fundamental properties of complex numbers and their exponential forms.
craig100
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hey again;
It doesn't seem to be my day for spotting the obvious;

I've come across this problem now:

2^{8n}\exp^{2ni\Pi} = 2^{8n}

This imples that exp^{2ni\Pi} = 1, i know that exp^{i\Pi} =-1, but is that related?

hmm, Latex issues...i'll try and fix them :) - sorted
Craig
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Well, using the exponential form: e^{2\pi i}=\cos(2\pi)+i\sin(2\pi)=1. So, e^{2\pi ni}=\cos(2n\pi)+i\sin(2n\pi) and since cos(2n pi)=cos(2 pi)=1, and sin(2n pi)=sin(2 pi)=0, the result exp(2ni pi)=1 is obtained
 
The relation to that famous identity is
e^{2i\pi}=(e^{i\pi})^2=(-1)^2=1.
 
Hi craig100,

you can visualize the complex number e^{i \theta} as a vector of length 1 that is rotated by an angle \theta with respect to the positive x-axis,
see .[/URL]

Also, see the section "Polar Form" here

The form z=r \cdot e^{i \theta} is also called polar form of the complex number z. The vector has the length r and an angle \theta with respect to the positive x axis.

If you visualize the complex number in that way, you can immediately see what value the complex number z will have for certain values such as
\theta = \pi/4, \pi/2, \pi, 2 \pi.

This example shows z=5 \cdot e^{i \pi /3}
 
Last edited by a moderator:
craig100 said:
This imples that exp^{2ni\Pi} = 1, i know that exp^{i\Pi} =-1, but is that related?

Best way to show how its related is Eighty's post.
 
Thank guys, quite simple afterall :smile:
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top