Complex Numbers: Defining an Ordered System

AI Thread Summary
Complex numbers are defined as ordered pairs of real numbers, facilitating operations like addition and multiplication. In complex analysis, the mapping w = f(z) illustrates how each complex number z corresponds to another complex number w in a different plane. The discussion highlights the importance of defining complex numbers in a structured way, despite the challenges in integrating the imaginary unit i into the real number system. References to standard texts on complex analysis support these definitions. Overall, the conversation emphasizes the foundational role of ordered pairs in understanding complex numbers and their applications.
lostcauses10x
Messages
87
Reaction score
0
Complex numbers?
Since the system is not an ordered pair, how then is it defined using the complex system as an ordered system to plot the z axis (Plane) to use a function?
At the point we input each point of the Real and imaginary plane into a function to get out an answer in the Z plane, is it now an ordered pair per point on input ?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
A complex number is an ordered pair.
 
In complex analysis, the relation w = f(z), where f is some function and w and z are complex number, is thought of as a mapping, whereby for each number z, the function f(z) points to, or 'maps', a different complex number w in a different complex plane.
 
DrClaude said:
A complex number is an ordered pair.

To be precise, we construct the complex numbers from a ordered pairs of real numbers by defining addition and multiplication.
 
pwsnafu
Where as I believe it is correct, in the link you gave: it is a statement given without any reference or source.
 
lostcauses10x said:
pwsnafu
Where as I believe it is correct, in the link you gave: it is a statement given without any reference or source.

It's the standard construction of the complex numbers. If you want a reference, see any text on complex analysis of algebra ever published.
 
Hey folks thanks. Simply put based of the limited ability to define i to the real set we created an set with the real and imaginary that is an analogy. of course from there end up with complex analysis etc.
Not sure what the "Mon" replies are, seem to add noting to the discussion.
 
Back
Top