Complex representation of a wave

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the complex representation of waves in optics, specifically how to convert cosine and sine functions into exponential form using Euler's formula. The key equation presented is E=Eoexp[k•r±⍵t], which relates to wave functions. Participants emphasize the importance of including the imaginary unit 'i' in the exponential representation and explain how phase shifts can be incorporated into sine and cosine functions. Overall, the conversation highlights the utility of complex numbers in simplifying wave calculations while addressing common confusions among students.
e101101
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Hi there,
I'm currently taking an Optics course and the teacher is expecting us to have an understanding of the complex representation of waves. Although, hardly any of us have even heard of this yet. I've tried to google how to convert a cos(obj) and sin(obj) to an exponential... but I just don't understand. I would really love it if someone could explain this to me, as this has been really been bringing me down.
Relevant Equations
E=Eoexp[k•r±⍵t]
Homework Statement: Hi there,
I'm currently taking an Optics course and the teacher is expecting us to have an understanding of the complex representation of waves. Although, hardly any of us have even heard of this yet. I've tried to google how to convert a cos(obj) and sin(obj) to an exponential... but I just don't understand. I would really love it if someone could explain this to me, as this has been really been bringing me down.
Homework Equations: E=Eoexp[k•r±⍵t]

This is an equation we saw in class today:

E=Eocos[k•r±⍵t] (where E, Eo, k and r are vectors). The answer was given to us (equation above), but I really want to understand why that is the result.

What would the complex representation of this function be? Could you please be thorough with your explanation... I am so lost and need a clear (and simple) answer.

Also, how would this result change if there was a constant in the argument of the cos function (ex: phase constant)? What if this was a sine function (I know you can switch any sine function to a cos, but I would like to know how to do it the 'hard' way?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • Like
Likes berkeman
e101101 said:
Homework Equations: E=Eoexp[k•r±⍵t]
You missed an i in the exponential.

e101101 said:
What would the complex representation of this function be? Could you please be thorough with your explanation... I am so lost and need a clear (and simple) answer.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_formula
e101101 said:
Also, how would this result change if there was a constant in the argument of the cos function (ex: phase constant)? What if this was a sine function (I know you can switch any sine function to a cos, but I would like to know how to do it the 'hard' way?
I'm not sure that this answers your question, but as you wrote, to general solution is a sum of a sine and a cosine. There can be combined into a phase-shifted cosine or sine. By convention, most of the time the cosine is used.
https://www.myphysicslab.com/springs/trig-identity-en.html
 
Here are some useful identities.

Euler's Identity: ##e^{i\theta} = \cos(\theta) + i \sin(\theta)##

From which you get:
##\cos(\theta) = \frac {(e^{i\theta}+ e^{-i\theta})} { 2} ##
##\sin(\theta) = \frac {(e^{i\theta}- e^{-i\theta})} { 2i} ##

And since a phase shift in sine or cosine can be written as a combination of sines and cosines, for example:
##A \cos(\omega t + \phi) = A [ \cos(\omega t) cos(\phi) - \sin(\omega t) \sin(\phi)]
= (A \cos\phi) \cos(\omega t) - (A \sin\phi) \sin(\omega t) \\
= B \cos(\omega t) + C \sin(\omega t)##
then you can write a general phase-shifted sine or cosine as a combination of exponentials using the above identities.

Note that you get both a positive and negative exponent when you make that substitution. If you have something representing a real-valued signal, then when represented as exponentials the full expression will have complex conjugate terms such that there's not actually any imaginary waves around.

But most of the time you don't worry about that kind of thing, and the exponential notation makes calculation of all kinds of things a heck of a lot easier.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes DrClaude and Delta2
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top