Complex representation of electric field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the complex representation of electric fields, particularly in the context of sinusoidal variations over time. Participants explore the implications of using complex numbers to describe electric fields, focusing on the preservation of magnitude in both complex and vector forms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how the magnitude of an electric field represented as a complex number can be preserved, given the transformation from a real to a complex representation.
  • Another participant suggests that to calculate quantities dependent on the fields, one must first take the real part of the complex representation before proceeding with calculations.
  • A different participant questions if the magnitude of the electric field can be equated between its complex and real representations, seeking clarification on the relationship between them.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the distinction between the magnitude of a complex number and the magnitude of a vector, emphasizing that both concepts must be specified in the context of electric fields.
  • One participant illustrates the relationship between the complex and vector magnitudes using an example of a plane electromagnetic wave, detailing how to evaluate physical quantities from the complex representation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the relationship between the magnitudes of the complex representation and the vector representation of the electric field. Multiple viewpoints are presented regarding how to interpret and calculate these magnitudes.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the need to clarify assumptions regarding the definitions of magnitude in both complex and vector contexts, as well as the importance of specifying which representation is being used in calculations.

Apteronotus
Messages
201
Reaction score
0
Confused.. please help!

Often when an electric field varies sinusoidally with time, it is represented as a complex number. Say,
\vec{E}(t)=A\cos(t) \cdot \hat{k}
We know at any time, the magnitude of E is A\cos(t).

Alternatively the same vector E is understood to be the real part of the complex number
\vec{E}(t)=A e^{i t}\cdot\hat{k} (right?)

But since we are now dealing with a complex vector, its magnitude is given by:
||\vec{E}||=\sqrt{Ae^{it}\cdot Ae^{-it}}=A

What happened? How can we ensure the magnitude of our vector is preserved when we represent it in its complex form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Of course you have to take the real part first and then square the electric field. Then you'll get the same magnitude as it must be. Just use

\exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t)=\cos(\omega t)-\mathrm{i} \sin(\omega t).

If \omega \in \mathbb{R}, which is the case for em. waves in free space, the real part simply \cos(\omega t).
 
I'm sorry vanhees, I'm not sure if I completely understand
Even if we use e^{it}=\cos(t)+i\sin(t)
then
\sqrt{Ae^{it}\cdot Ae^{-it}}=\sqrt{A^2(\cos(t)+i\sin(t))(\cos(t)-i\sin(t))}=A\sqrt{\cos^2(t)+\sin^2(t)}=A<br />

OR

Do you mean
<br /> ||\vec{E}||=||Ae^{it}||=||Re(Ae^{it})||<br />?
 
Can anyone help me out on this?
 
Again: If you want to calculate quantities, which do not depend linearly on the fields you have to take first the real part and then go on.

Take your example (corrected for obvious errors concerning the argument of the exponential function) of a plane electromagnetic wave in free space,

\vec{E}&#039;(t,\vec{x})=\vec{E}_0 \exp(-\mathrm{i} \omega t+\mathrm{i} \vec{k} \cdot \vec{x})

with \omega=c |\vec{k}|.

Of course the physical electromagnetic field here is

\vec{E}=\mathrm{Re} \vec{E}&#039;=\mathrm{Re} \vec{E}_0 \cos (\omega t-\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x})+\mathrm{Im} \vec{E}_0 \sin(\omega t-\vec{k} \cdot \vec{x}).

Now you can use this expression to evaluate, e.g., the electric part of the energy density, i.e., \vec{E}^2/2, etc.
 
Hi vanhees

I keep reading your reply over and over again hoping to understand this problem better, but my uneducated mind is just not getting it.

Is it true that
||\vec{E}||=||Ae^{it}||=||Re(Ae^{it})||
 
Apteronotus, you are confusing two very different things: the magnitude of a complex number (which is the length of the number's vector in the complex plane), and the magnitude of a vector (which is the length of the actual vector in real space).

The electric field is both a complex number and a vector, so you have to specify which magnitude you mean. The complex-number magnitude of the electric field is the peak component strength, whereas the vector-length magnitude of the electric field is the instantaneous total strength. If you take both the complex-number magnitude and the vector-length magnitude of the electric field, you end up with the peak total strength. For instance:

If E = (Ex \hat{\textbf{x}} + Ey \hat{\textbf{y}})eikz-iωt

then

|E|complex-number = Ex \hat{\textbf{x}} + Ey \hat{\textbf{y}}
|E|vector-length = \sqrt{(E_x^2 + E_y^2)cos^2(kz-\omega t)}
|E|both = \sqrt{E_x^2 + E_y^2}
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
903
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K