Composite Bosons: Same State? Fermion Implications

  • Thread starter Thread starter bsaucer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bosons Composite
bsaucer
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
If two boson are each composed of two identical fermions in opposite spin states, can the composite bosons occupy the same state? If so wouldn't that cause their fermions to also occupy identical states? (Certainly, they can't occupy four different spin states, can they?)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you mean for instance if He-4 are subject under Bose-Einstein statistics?
 
I think he means something more like if He-3 forms pairs and is subject to B-E condensation. The answer is "yes". The classic example is Cooper pairs in a superconductor. A second example is superfluid Helium-3.
 
Exactly. But isn't there a paradox concerning the individual fermion components occupying identical states?
 
bsaucer said:
Exactly. But isn't there a paradox concerning the individual fermion components occupying identical states?

No, because these are different states. You can use the Cooper pair as an example. One pair may have (k1, -k1) momentum state, another (k2, -k2), (k3, -k3),... etc.

So each pair still has zero net momentum, but each electron still occupies a unique state. One also needs to remember that these are single-particle states, not 2-particle states, which is what a composite boson (cooper pair) in this case is.

Zz.
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Back
Top