Compton Scattering and Recoiling Electron Momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter CoffeeCrow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Shift
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion on Compton scattering, it is established that when X-rays with a wavelength of 55 pm scatter off a valence electron at 180 degrees, the wavelength of the X-ray increases due to energy transfer, resulting in a longer wavelength. The calculated Compton shift of 4.85 pm suggests the scattered X-ray should have a wavelength of 59.85 pm. However, there is confusion as the provided solution states the wavelength is 50.14 pm, which contradicts the expected outcome. The momentum of the recoiling electron is calculated using the wavelength values, leading to discrepancies between the user's calculations and the provided solution. The discussion emphasizes the need for clarity on energy transfer and wavelength shifts in Compton scattering.
CoffeeCrow
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



X-rays with wavelength 55pm are scattered from a graphite target. Consider an x-ray which is scattered from a valence electron at an angle of 180 degrees (back towards the x-ray source).

a. Is the wavelength of the X-ray greater or less than before the collision?
b. What is the momentum of the recoiling electrons?

Homework Equations



##\Delta\lambda=\frac {h} {mc}(1-cos(\theta))##
##p=\frac {h} {\lambda}##

The Attempt at a Solution



Part a. seems obvious. The X-ray collides with an electron, transfers some kinetic energy to it, losing some energy in the process. Less energy, longer wavelength, right?

Part b however, is giving me a few issues.
I start by finding the Compton shift for 180 degrees, which gives \Delta\lambda=4.85pm.
This means that the scattered X-ray should have a wavelength of 55+4.85=59.85pm, correct?
This is where things get a bit hairy. The solution for this problem however, states that the recoiling X-ray has a wavelength of 50.14 pm. This doesn't seem to make sense, as the energy of the X-ray has increased, despite transferring energy to the electron (these solutions have had issues in the past). Anyway,they then simply use p=\frac{h}{\lambda} to calculate the momentum of the recoiling electron, yielding (with their wavelength), 1.32E-23 Ns.
I however have tried the following:
##p_{i}=p_{f}##
##\frac{h}{\lambda_{i}}=p_{electron}-\frac{h}{\lambda_{f}}##
##p_{electron}=h(\frac{1}{\lambda_{i}}+\frac{1}{\lambda_{f}})##
##p_{electron}=2.31E-23Ns## (using my values for wavelength, 55pm and 59.85pm)
OR:
##p_{electron}=2.53E-23Ns##(using their values)
Which of course, doesn't agree with the solutions.
So, I was wondering, am I missing something fundamental and conceptual in regards to energy and wavelength shift and, is my momentum approach valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CoffeeCrow said:
Part a. seems obvious. The X-ray collides with an electron, transfers some kinetic energy to it, losing some energy in the process. Less energy, longer wavelength, right?
Right.
CoffeeCrow said:
This means that the scattered X-ray should have a wavelength of 55+4.85=59.85pm, correct?
I didn't check the number but the approach is right.
50.14 pm is clearly wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes CoffeeCrow
Alright, thanks, I was just worrying I'd managed to miss something fundamental!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top