Compton Scattering Concept Question

godtripp
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I had an issue with compton scattering that I never received a satisfactory answer for. My issue was that after the collision, there exists a y component of momentum... but all diagrams of the compton effect align the axis center to center from the photon to the electron and on top of that each are dimensionless point particles.

So where does this y-component come from? Does the wave nature of the photon give the particle some y component of momentum or is it all in the x direction?

Hope i was clear enough...thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An electron and a photon are not point particles. If they were, the classical description would be eneough, instead you know that QM is required.
Also note that the concept "being a point particle" depends on the kind and energy of the interaction too.
 
If I understand you correctly you wonder why there can be a y-component of the momentum after the collision when the incident photon only has momentum in the x-direction.

The answer is that the total momentum in the y-direction after the collision is the same as before, zero. The momenta of the electron and the photon together add up to zero after the collision. This is essentialy analogous to one billiard ball hitting another - the two balls may go off in different directions (i.e. not straight forward) after the collision even though the incoming ball only travels in the 'straight forward'-direction. Was that answer to your question?

Also, as far as we know today, the electron is point-like and has no internal structure (of course this might change with future theories). The photon on the other hand is a different story. It shows a so called wave-particle duality, behaving both as a particle and a wave.
 
Thanks for your answers guys!
 
kloptok said:
Also, as far as we know today, the electron is point-like and has no internal structure (of course this might change with future theories). The photon on the other hand is a different story. It shows a so called wave-particle duality, behaving both as a particle and a wave.
Only the photon has wave-particle duality? :smile:
 
lightarrow said:
Only the photon has wave-particle duality? :smile:

Dang, you got me! :blushing: The thing was that I got the impression that the tread opener only thought of the photon as a point particle. But sure, the electron, as every particle, shows particle as well as wave behavior.
 
Last edited:
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top