Computability theory essay - advice before I begin

  • Thread starter Thread starter scienalc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Essay Theory
scienalc
Messages
16
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have to write an ~10 pages essay on Computabilty theory as part of my PhD logic course. Given that that is a very broad topic and that I found very little information on the internet, I would like to ask if anybody has had any experience with that?

My primary issue would be which subtopics should I focus on, i.e. the structure of my essay. What would you suggest a ~10 pages essay about Computability Theory should contain?

But any other help, including good sites, e-books, journal articles, ... is very welcome.

Thanks a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
scienalc said:
Hi,

I have to write an ~10 pages essay on Computabilty theory as part of my PhD logic course. Given that that is a very broad topic and that I found very little information on the internet, I would like to ask if anybody has had any experience with that?

My primary issue would be which subtopics should I focus on, i.e. the structure of my essay. What would you suggest a ~10 pages essay about Computability Theory should contain?

But any other help, including good sites, e-books, journal articles, ... is very welcome.

Thanks a lot

Is it supposed to be more mathematical, or more philosophical? Perhaps after developing the background of what computable numbers are; you can spend some time delving into the non-computable ones. These are the vast, uncountable set of real numbers that cannot be characterized in any way using finite strings of symbols.

So these are numbers that can never be programmed into computers, appear to be totally random and meaningless strings of bits ... and yet, without them, the continuum would be full of holes.

So this is the boundary between the discrete and the continuous. The computable and the ineffable.

A lot of people who come to set theory from computer science really dislike uncountable sets and noncomputable numbers.

So five pages general background; and five pages on the nature of uncomputable numbers; the ways in which some computer scientists don't like them very much; the way they're essential to the notion of the mathematical continuum; and the philosophical problem of the existence of important entities -- the noncomputable numbers -- that cannot possibly be programmed into our algorithmic machines? Perhaps there's something important about the noncomputable numbers.

I think this would be a pretty cool paper.
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top