Explain EM Drive: A Level Essay Help

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Falcus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Drive Em Explain
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The EM Drive, a controversial concept in propulsion technology, claims to generate thrust by reflecting microwaves within a tapered chamber, resulting in an unequal force distribution. Despite its intriguing premise, the EM Drive is classified as a "crackpot" theory by the Physics Forums community, with extensive debunking of its claims. Roger Shawyer's equation F = q(E + vB) is mentioned in relation to the electromagnetic fields involved, but the consensus is that the concept lacks scientific validity and is not suitable for serious academic discussion.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic physics principles, particularly Newton's laws of motion.
  • Familiarity with electromagnetic theory, including electric and magnetic fields.
  • Knowledge of microwave technology and its applications in propulsion.
  • Awareness of scientific methodology and the criteria for evaluating theories.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the principles of microwave propulsion and its theoretical foundations.
  • Study the scientific critiques of the EM Drive and similar reactionless drive concepts.
  • Explore Roger Shawyer's original papers and the equations he proposed.
  • Investigate alternative propulsion technologies that are scientifically validated, such as ion propulsion.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, aerospace engineers, and anyone interested in the evaluation of unconventional propulsion theories and their implications for space exploration.

Falcus
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am writing an essay for my extended project A Level, and part of this I am writing about the EMDrive. I thought I would be able to skim over how it works mostly earlier but have decided I would rather not. I am struggling to understand how it works and any explanation would be helpful. To my understanding, microwaves are fired into a tapered chamber and when they hit off one end they exert a greater force than on the other creating a resultant thrust. I have seen this compared to flying by pulling up on your shoe laces, which I have to agree is what I picture it as. I have come to understand that there is actually a reasonable amount of controversy surrounding this concept. I also believe magnet and electric fields are involved somewhere? Due to Roger Shawyer using the equation F= q(E+vB) in his original paper.

Thanks in advance
Falcus

P.S - I posed a question for the same essay about physically defining lorentzian wormholes also so if anyone could answer that would be extremely helpful, also if it helps the title of my essay is 'What recognised theories, if physically achieved, could aid future space exploration?' and I understand how the theories aid this, just defining them is my issue due to my limited A level understanding accompanied by a plethora of further reading.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread closed temporarily for Moderation...
 
This thread will remain closed. The EM Drive is on the list of PF Forbidden Topics (see the Rules link at the top of the page under INFO). It is crackpot stuff, and not worth the time to debunk. From the Forbidden Topics list:
micromass said:
EMDrive and other reactionless drives
Articles suggesting that NASA, the Chinese government, or some other governmental actor is working on such a technology frequently appear in the popular press. These claims have been extensively debunked and are not acceptable references under the Physics Forums rules.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K