Compute Commutator: JxJy, Jz | i ħ Result

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the commutator [Jx Jy, Jz] for angular momentum operators. The user applies the commutation relation formula and simplifies the expression, leading to a result that does not match any of the provided multiple-choice answers. The conversation highlights the importance of recognizing that the J operators represent Pauli spin matrices, which square to 1. The user expresses gratitude for the advice received, indicating a collaborative effort to solve the problem. Ultimately, the calculation remains unresolved, emphasizing the complexity of the commutation relations in quantum mechanics.
nickdi
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find the resul of [Jx Jy , Jz] where J is the angular momentum operator.
Possible answers to this multiple chioce question are
A) 0
B) i ħ Jz
C) i ħ Jz Jx
D) i ħ Jx Jz
E) i ħ Jx Jy

Homework Equations


[AB,C]=A [B,C]+[A,B] B
[Ji , Jj]=i ħ εijk Jk where εijk is the Levi-Civita symbol

The Attempt at a Solution


First of all, I used the first formula in this way
[Jx Jy , Jz]=Jx[Jy , Jz]+[Jx , Jz]Jy
Second, I used the second formula to write
Jx[Jy , Jz]+[Jx , Jz]Jy=i ħ(J2x-J2y)
Now I am stuck here because this result is not listed in the possible answers.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your math is fine. Just remember that within those J's are pauli spin matrices. When those are squared they equal 1.
 
  • Like
Likes nickdi
Thanks DuckAmuck for the advice!
That was helpful
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...

Similar threads

Back
Top