Compute electrostatic field

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the computational challenges associated with calculating the local electrostatic field in molecular modeling and simulation. Participants explore the complexities of this topic, including references to various charge partitioning methods in quantum chemistry.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the high computational expense of calculating the local electrostatic field, seeking clarification on the underlying issues.
  • Another participant suggests that the questions posed are complex and may not have simple answers, indicating that specific inquiries would be more manageable.
  • References to academic journals are provided as potentially helpful resources for understanding the topic better.
  • A participant mentions that the references were obtained from a colleague interested in alternative charge partitioning methods, implying a connection to broader discussions in quantum chemistry.
  • There is an emphasis on the need for more focused questions to facilitate meaningful discussion and responses.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature of the questions being asked, with some indicating that they are too broad or complex for simple answers. There is no consensus on the computational challenges themselves, as the discussion remains exploratory.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the complexity of the topic and the necessity of specific inquiries, suggesting that the discussion may be limited by the broadness of the initial question.

mather
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
hello!

"there is a high computational expense associated with calculating the local electrostatic field [in molecular modeling and simulation]"

why? what is exactly the problem?

thanks!
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Mather, you're asking many many questions on the chemistry forum, none of which have simple answers. It seems that if you're at a level to ask such questions you should be able to realize that you shouldn't expect a simple answer from an internet message board. If you have specific questions, those are much more easily addressed.

As for this question, here are some references that you may find helpful:
Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol 21, page 1049 (2000)
Journal of Physical Chemistry vol 97 page 10269 (1993)
 
Einstein Mcfly said:
As for this question, here are some references that you may find helpful:
Journal of Computational Chemistry, vol 21, page 1049 (2000)
Journal of Physical Chemistry vol 97 page 10269 (1993)
interesting findings, how you came up with these? which search terms you used and where?
 
mather said:
interesting findings, how you came up with these? which search terms you used and where?

I was given these references by a colleague who was interested in this method as an alternative to other charge partitioning methods in quantum chemistry (mulliken, natural population analysis, bader, hirshfeld, vornoi etc). As I said in other topics, if you actually want to understand any of these broad questions of yours, you're going to have to put quite a bit more time into it than google searches or message board posts. Please, if you have specific questions, ask them. They have some hope of getting answered in the way you seem to want.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K