A Compute Induced Metric on Kerr Event Horizon

Jonsson
Messages
78
Reaction score
0
Hello there,

Suppose ## \Delta = r^2 + 2GMr + a^2## and ## \rho^2 = r^2 + a^2 \cos ^2 \theta ##. The Kerr metric is
$$
ds^2 = - (1 - \frac{2GMr}{\rho^2})dt^2 - \frac{4GMar\sin^2 \theta}{\rho^2} d t d \phi + \frac{\rho^2}{\Delta} dr^2 + \rho^2 d \theta^2 + \frac{\sin^2 \theta}{\rho^2} \left[ (r^2 + a^2)^2 - a^2 \Delta \sin^2 \theta \right] d \phi^2
$$

I want to determine the area of the inner horizon of the black hole. But first I need to determine the induced metric on the horizon. Suppose that the radius of the innermost horizon is ## r_*##. My tutor stated without proof that the induced metric was
$$
ds^2 = \rho_*^2 d \theta^2 + \frac{\sin ^2 \theta}{\rho_*^2} (r_*^2 + a^2) d \phi^2
$$
How do one compute this induced metric from the Kerr metric?

Thank you for your time.

Kind regards,
Marius
 
Physics news on Phys.org
On the horizon ##t## and ##r## are constants, so ##dt=0## and ##dr=0##.
 
martinbn said:
On the horizon ##t## and ##r## are constants, so ##dt=0## and ##dr=0##.

Also ##\Delta = 0## on the horizon.
 
That's right. Got it now. Thanks
 
Jonsson said:
Suppose ##\Delta = r^2 + 2GMr + a^2##

This isn't quite correct. It should be ##\Delta = r^2 - 2GMr + a^2##.
 
  • Like
Likes Jonsson
You're probably working through things yourself but if you want a check, the equation for the surface area of both the inner and outer horizon in Kerr metric is-
A_{\pm}=\pm4\pi\left(r^2_{\pm}+a^2\right)
where
r_{\pm}=M\pm\sqrt{M^2-a^2}
where \pm denotes the outer (+) and inner (-) horizon.

One source-
https://redirect.viglink.com/?format=go&jsonp=vglnk_149222179481113&key=6afc78eea2339e9c047ab6748b0d37e7&libId=j1illvfl010009we000DApptnkylp&loc=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Fthreads%2Fsecond-law-of-thermodynamics-and-the-macroscopic-world.833987%2F%23post-5238097&v=1&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.researchgate.net%2Fpublication%2F230923684_Entropy_of_Kerr-Newman_Black_Hole_Continuously_Goes_to_Zero_when_the_Hole_Changes_from_Nonextreme_Case_to_Extreme_Case&ref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.physicsforums.com%2Fsearch%2F5021084%2F%3Fq%3Dkerr%26o%3Drelevance%26c%5Buser%5D%5B0%5D%3D68677&title=Second%20law%20of%20thermodynamics%20and%20the%20macroscopic%20world%20%7C%20Physics%20Forums%20-%20The%20Fusion%20of%20Science%20and%20Community&txt=Negative%20Temperature%20of%20Inner%20Horizon%20and%20Planck%20Absolute%20Entropy%20of%20a%20Kerr-Newman%20Black%20Hole by Liu Bo Liu & Wen-Biao
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In this video I can see a person walking around lines of curvature on a sphere with an arrow strapped to his waist. His task is to keep the arrow pointed in the same direction How does he do this ? Does he use a reference point like the stars? (that only move very slowly) If that is how he keeps the arrow pointing in the same direction, is that equivalent to saying that he orients the arrow wrt the 3d space that the sphere is embedded in? So ,although one refers to intrinsic curvature...
ASSUMPTIONS 1. Two identical clocks A and B in the same inertial frame are stationary relative to each other a fixed distance L apart. Time passes at the same rate for both. 2. Both clocks are able to send/receive light signals and to write/read the send/receive times into signals. 3. The speed of light is anisotropic. METHOD 1. At time t[A1] and time t[B1], clock A sends a light signal to clock B. The clock B time is unknown to A. 2. Clock B receives the signal from A at time t[B2] and...
So, to calculate a proper time of a worldline in SR using an inertial frame is quite easy. But I struggled a bit using a "rotating frame metric" and now I'm not sure whether I'll do it right. Couls someone point me in the right direction? "What have you tried?" Well, trying to help truly absolute layppl with some variation of a "Circular Twin Paradox" not using an inertial frame of reference for whatevere reason. I thought it would be a bit of a challenge so I made a derivation or...
Back
Top