Compute Nickel Filter Thickness to Increase X-Ray Ratio

N8
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If the ratio I(K\alpha)/I(K\beta) before filtering is 7.5:1 for a copper target, then compute the thickness of a nickel filter, that would increase this ratio of 500:1.

Mass Absorption Coefficients (cm^{2}/g)

Cu: \rho = 8.93 g/cm^{3}

K\alpha (0.1542nm)
\mu/\rho = 51.54

K\beta (0.1392nm)
\mu/\rho = 38.74

Ni: \rho = 8.91 g/cm^{3}

K\alpha (0.1542nm)
tex]\mu/\rho[/tex] = 48.83

K\beta (0.1392nm)
\mu / \rho = 282.8


Homework Equations



I_{x} = I_{0} e^{-\mu x}

The Attempt at a Solution



The answer is 20 microns.

Trying to align these equations up and solve has not yielded the correct answer. Also, the effect of filter on the mass absorption coeffient can be modified by weight fractions (\mu / \rho ) = x(\mu / \rho)_{1} + (1-x)(\mu / \rho)_{2}where x is the weight fraction of one element.

But I am not sure how to incorporate this into my calculations.


Also, unfortunately, my book Structure of Materials (Graff) does not provide any worked out problems.

Any help would be much appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nevermind I was ably to solve this with the relevant equation and calculations for the linear absorption coeffecients of Kalpha and Kbeta for Nickel under copper radiation
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top