Computer modeling of physical systems

AI Thread Summary
Modeling physical systems, particularly the response of sound waves to resonators, can be approached through grid-based methods akin to cellular automata. This technique involves creating a grid where each cell's state is influenced by its neighbors, allowing for wave propagation simulation. Challenges include addressing wave directionality and the isotropic limitations of a square grid, which can affect accuracy when waves travel at angles. Lattice methods, such as the lattice-Boltzmann method, are suggested for fluid flow problems, with considerations for adaptive mesh refinement to enhance accuracy. Exploring these concepts could lead to effective modeling solutions for complex physical systems.
TheRealColbert
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
I am thinking about ways to model physical systems. An example of the type of problem I want to look at would be the response of sound waves to a series of resonators. Here is a java applet of a ripple tank, which is along the lines of what I am thinking of. http://www.falstad.com/ripple/ I expect the things I would like to look at would be intractable from a differential equations approach. Maybe I could do it from a finite element analysis approach, but I think that is beyond my budget, skill and ambition.

So to simplify things, I was wondering if these types of problems can be modeled by creating a series of grids, and making a rule such that each box in the grid uses the state of its neighbors to determine it's own state. Each step in time would allow the wave to "propagate" through the system, and hopefully would exhibit characteristics of the physical system being studied. I think this is kind of like cellular automata. (maybe it IS cellular automata) In any case, what would be the best direction to take to investigate this further? What is it called, and are there key words I could use to search, etc? Is it a dead end?

Some initial problems as I begin to think about it are: How do you deal with the "directionality" of a wave? (ie. if you were modeling a moving ball, you would get stuff flying off everywhere, not a nice, contained moving shape) Also, a square grid isn't isotropic. What problems will that cause when you have a wave or something else going at an angle to the grid.

Any thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top