Computer Science Classes Relevant to a Physicist

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on selecting Computer Science courses that will complement a major in Physics and enhance employability in physics-related careers. The participant outlines required courses for a Computer Science minor and highlights four classes: Discrete Systems Modeling/Simulation, Networks & Distributed Processing, Microprocessor Interfacing & Lab, and Computability/Automata. The emphasis is on the first three courses for their direct applications in physics simulations and hardware interfacing. Another contributor suggests replacing the Computability/Automata course with Analysis of Algorithms, arguing that while the former is not irrelevant, it may not be as beneficial for a physicist compared to understanding algorithm efficiency and performance. Overall, the focus is on practical skills that align with physics applications in technology and simulations.
KMcFadden
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
My plan is to major in Physics and to minor in Computer Science. Here are the classes required for a minor in Computer Science at the college I will be attending:

http://www.unf.edu/catalog/link/MINORCCIS3/

Here is a link for course descriptions: http://www.unf.edu/catalog/courses/ug/dept/6502/

I'm required to take four classes of those listed at the bottom of the first link. What classes do you think will be most beneficial to someone seeking employment as a physicist (or some other physics related career)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
COP 4300 Discrete Systems Modeling/Simulation - do physics simulations
CNT 4504 (CEN4516) Networks & Distributed Processing - do physics simulations on many machines to speed things up
CDA 4312/4312L Microprocessor Interfacing & Lab - in-case you end up building computer chips or just using them
COT 3210 Computability/Automata - this has interesting uses in a variety of physics areas.
 
Thanks MathWarrior
 
MathWarrior said:
COP 4300 Discrete Systems Modeling/Simulation - do physics simulations
CNT 4504 (CEN4516) Networks & Distributed Processing - do physics simulations on many machines to speed things up
CDA 4312/4312L Microprocessor Interfacing & Lab - in-case you end up building computer chips or just using them
COT 3210 Computability/Automata - this has interesting uses in a variety of physics areas.

I'd agree with the first three, but I'd take COT4400: Analysis of Algorithms instead of the Computability/Automata course. I don't think COT 3210 is bad by any means, but you probably don't really need that much formal language theory. (As a physicist, you probably won't be called on to write many parsers, and you'll *never* have to determine if something is computable or not.) On the other hand, I think it would be valuable to take a course discussing general classes of algorithms and their efficiency (and limits to how efficient they can be).
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top