Computing Integrals with Wavelet Scaling and Translation Parameters

omer21
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
I am looking for a software that can compute the following integral
<br /> ∫_0^1f(x)\phi(2^jx-k)dx.<br />

\phi(x) is scaling function of a wavelet family (especially Daubechies), j and k are scaling and translation parameters respectively.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Basically any software that can do numerics for you, e.g. Wolfram Mathematica, Matlab, or you can write a C code as well (using GSL).
 
omer21 said:
I am looking for a software that can compute the following integral
<br /> ∫_0^1f(x)\phi(2^jx-k)dx.<br />

If you can use this
http://reference.wolfram.com/mathematica/guide/Wavelets.html
to translate what you are interested in into one or two simple concrete examples then we can try it and see if the results will be in a form you can use.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top