Concept Decomposing of Partial Fractions

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of decomposing partial fractions in algebra, specifically addressing the rationale behind equating coefficients and the structure of the decomposition itself. Participants explore both theoretical understanding and practical application of these techniques.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions why equating coefficients works in the context of polynomial equations, seeking a deeper understanding of the underlying principles.
  • Another participant suggests an alternative form for the decomposition of fractions, indicating that the numerator can have a degree less than that of the denominator.
  • A participant expresses confusion about the necessity of repeating a factor in the decomposition, wondering if it relates to the degrees of the numerators and denominators.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the assumption that two polynomial functions are equivalent for all x if their corresponding coefficients are equal.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express varying levels of understanding regarding the rationale behind equating coefficients and the structure of partial fraction decomposition. No consensus is reached on the necessity of repeating factors in the decomposition process.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the importance of polynomial degree in determining the form of the numerator in the decomposition, but the discussion does not resolve the underlying assumptions or limitations of these techniques.

Who May Find This Useful

Students and individuals interested in algebra, particularly those studying polynomial functions and partial fraction decomposition techniques.

babby
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a few questions about decomposing partial fractions. I know how to solve these problems, but I just don't understand why I'm doing some of the things.

1. Why does equating coefficients work? I don't understand the idea behind it.

2. When you are decomposing fractions into constants

EX:

1/(x-1)(x-2)^2 = A/(x-1) + B/(x-2) + C/(x-2)^2

Why do you have to repeat (x-2), instead of just putting B/(x-2)^2?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could, instead, do this:
\frac{A}{x-1} + \frac{Bx+C}{(x-2)^2}.
The point is that the numerator can be anything with degree less than the degree of the denominator.
 
g_edgar said:
You could, instead, do this:
\frac{A}{x-1} + \frac{Bx+C}{(x-2)^2}.
The point is that the numerator can be anything with degree less than the degree of the denominator.

Ah, that was what I was originally thinking, but forgot the variable. But is there a reason why you have to repeat the function when doing it the other way? I don't understand how it works. Is it because the first part of the function:

B/(x-2) eliminates the need for a numerator with one degree less than the denominator seen in

C/(x-2)^2?
 
OK, I understand that part now, but I have another question:

Can somebody explain to me why equating coefficients work?

Example:
8x^3+13x = Ax^3 + 2Ax + Bx^2 + 2B + Cx + D

expanded into:

8x^3 + 13x = Ax^3 + Bx^2 + (2A+C)x + 2(B+D)

where A,B,C,D are constants.

Why does 8 = A; 0 = B; 13 = 2A + C; etc.

I know they have same power variables, but why does this actually work? Thanks!
 
The technique involves the assumption that for the correct values of unknowns such as A, B, and C, both sides of the equation are equivalent for all x. This assmption would still hold after manipulation to put both sides in polynomial form. It should be obvious that two polynomial functions of x are equal for all x if the corresponding coefficients are equal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K