Concept Decomposing of Partial Fractions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the process of decomposing partial fractions and the reasoning behind equating coefficients. It explains that when decomposing a fraction, repeating terms like (x-2) is necessary to account for the multiplicity of roots, which ensures the correct form of the decomposition. The participants clarify that the numerator's degree must be less than the denominator's degree, which allows for a more general representation. Additionally, equating coefficients works because it establishes that two polynomial expressions are equivalent for all values of x, leading to the conclusion that corresponding coefficients must be equal. Understanding these concepts is crucial for mastering partial fraction decomposition in algebra.
babby
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I have a few questions about decomposing partial fractions. I know how to solve these problems, but I just don't understand why I'm doing some of the things.

1. Why does equating coefficients work? I don't understand the idea behind it.

2. When you are decomposing fractions into constants

EX:

1/(x-1)(x-2)^2 = A/(x-1) + B/(x-2) + C/(x-2)^2

Why do you have to repeat (x-2), instead of just putting B/(x-2)^2?

Thanks.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You could, instead, do this:
\frac{A}{x-1} + \frac{Bx+C}{(x-2)^2}.
The point is that the numerator can be anything with degree less than the degree of the denominator.
 
g_edgar said:
You could, instead, do this:
\frac{A}{x-1} + \frac{Bx+C}{(x-2)^2}.
The point is that the numerator can be anything with degree less than the degree of the denominator.

Ah, that was what I was originally thinking, but forgot the variable. But is there a reason why you have to repeat the function when doing it the other way? I don't understand how it works. Is it because the first part of the function:

B/(x-2) eliminates the need for a numerator with one degree less than the denominator seen in

C/(x-2)^2?
 
OK, I understand that part now, but I have another question:

Can somebody explain to me why equating coefficients work?

Example:
8x^3+13x = Ax^3 + 2Ax + Bx^2 + 2B + Cx + D

expanded into:

8x^3 + 13x = Ax^3 + Bx^2 + (2A+C)x + 2(B+D)

where A,B,C,D are constants.

Why does 8 = A; 0 = B; 13 = 2A + C; etc.

I know they have same power variables, but why does this actually work? Thanks!
 
The technique involves the assumption that for the correct values of unknowns such as A, B, and C, both sides of the equation are equivalent for all x. This assmption would still hold after manipulation to put both sides in polynomial form. It should be obvious that two polynomial functions of x are equal for all x if the corresponding coefficients are equal.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top