Concept Question about Excitation of Atoms

AI Thread Summary
When an electron strikes a mercury atom with sufficient energy, it can excite the atom to a higher energy level by transferring part of its kinetic energy. In contrast, if a photon with the same energy strikes the atom, it may not excite the atom because the energy of the photon must match the specific energy difference required for the transition, not just the kinetic energy of the incoming electron. The confusion arises from interpreting "same amount of energy" without clarifying whether it refers to the energy of the photon or the energy required for the atomic transition. Thus, the electron's kinetic energy and the energy required for excitation are distinct concepts. Understanding these differences is crucial for grasping atomic excitation processes.
LHC
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
Let's say, for ease of reference, an electron strikes a mercury atom with just enough energy such that this mercury atom is excited to another energy level. What would happen if a photon struck this atom with the same amount of energy? I remember encourtering a True/False problem like this in a textbook, and the answer was that it won't be excited. How is this so?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It sounds like what the question intends is that the electron has a certain amount of kinetic energy, but only transferred a portion of it to an atomic electron to cause its upward "transition" (the colliding electron continues on with reduced KE). The photon's energy is being compared to the electron's initial kinetic energy, rather than the energy required for the transition. Anyway, that's how I'm understanding this.

I guess it isn't clear what is referred to in the question by the phrase "same amount of energy". The same as what?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top