Conceptual issue with rolling sphere and friction.

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the conceptual understanding of a hollow cylinder rolling down an inclined ramp and the necessary coefficient of friction for it to roll without sliding. The original poster is confused about the torque balance, noting that the frictional force seems to be the only torque acting on the cylinder. Participants clarify that while any friction can initiate rolling, there is a specific threshold of friction required for "pure rolling" without sliding. The author of the referenced book presents the situation as an either-or scenario, which adds to the confusion. Ultimately, the consensus is that rolling can occur with sliding if friction is present, but perfect rolling requires a sufficient coefficient of friction.
mfig
Messages
283
Reaction score
99
EDIT: Ooops, the title says sphere, but it is a cylinder. I cannot edit the title... sorry...

I saw this problem in a book and it is really bugging me. It is not a homework problem, I have the fully worked out solution in the book. I just have a conceptual problem.

Given a hollow cylinder of mass M and radius R on a ramp inclined at angle α, what coefficient of friction is necessary for the cylinder to roll down the ramp?
The author points out that there are two forces acting on the cylinder. One is the normal force and the other is the force of friction. The normal force acts perpendicular to the ramp, whereas the frictional force acts in the up-ramp direction, parallel to the ramp.

My problem is this: if we do a torque balance about the center of the cylinder, there is only one torque - the frictional force acting on a lever arm equal to the radius of the cylinder. If this is true, then how come ANY frictional force won't cause the thing to roll? In other words, what is this torque balancing against when it is the ONLY torque? It would seem that no matter how small, a frictional force is the only thing torquing the cylinder and so must cause it to roll. Yet the author says that it will not roll if the coefficient of friction is less than tan(α)/2 - it will only slide down the ramp.

Where is my logic wrong?? Thanks...
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose the author is talking about rolling 'perfectly' (without sliding at the same time)
Cheers,
 
I suppose the author is talking about rolling 'perfectly' (without sliding at the same time)


I suppose so, but how does this resolve the problem?
 
Maybe I didn't understand your question ?
What I was saying is that, as you say, any friction will cause the cylinder to roll, but thee is a specific friction treshold that will allow the roll to be 'perfect' (the cylinder will not slide, just roll)
 
What I was saying is that, as you say, any friction will cause the cylinder to roll, but thee is a specific friction treshold that will allow the roll to be 'perfect' (the cylinder will not slide, just roll)

Now I understand what you meant. Perhaps that is it. The author seems to put it in terms of either it rolls or it slides. Here is link to the book. The one example is on the bottom of page 248. Here the author isn't quite as explicitly either-or on this example, but there is a follow-up problem on page 319 (problem 11.12), with the answer given on page 584 that sounds definitely like either-or.

http://www.ciberdigital.net/books/Cambridge_UP_-_Classical_Mechanics.pdf


I guess you must be correct though, it is not either sliding or rolling, it is either pure rolling or rolling with sliding if there is any friction whatsoever.

Thanks.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K