Conceptual problem with projectile motion

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a projectile motion problem, specifically calculating the maximum height (hmax) using the y-component of velocity. The user initially finds the correct answer but seeks to practice the derivation, leading to confusion over the use of constants like 9.8 m/s² instead of the variable g for acceleration due to gravity. After some algebra, it is clarified that the values are indeed equivalent, but the user is advised to maintain consistency by using g throughout to avoid complications. The conversation highlights the importance of using standard variables in physics problems for clarity. Ultimately, the user resolves their confusion by recognizing the algebraic equivalence of their results.
1MileCrash
Messages
1,338
Reaction score
41

Homework Statement



[PLAIN]http://img23.imageshack.us/img23/4554/physicshomework.png


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I have the right answer because it is obvious, but I wanted to practice working this out regardless, and I have something slightly different for hmax.

First, I found the y-component of velocity to be:

V_{o}sin\theta_{o} - 9.8t

It follows that at the highest point, that this is equal to 0. So I set it equal to 0 and solved for t.

t = \frac{V_{o}sin\theta_{o}}{9.8}

Integrating my y velocity gives y position:

y(t) = (V_{o}sin\theta_{o})t - 4.9t^{2}

And solving for our time gives me:

h_{max} = V_{o}sin\theta_{o}(\frac{V_{o}sin\theta_{o}}{9.8}) - 4.9(\frac{V_{o}sin\theta_{o}}{9.8})^{2}

Where did I go wrong?

Thanks!

EDIT nevermind! They are the same, just had to do some algebra.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The first thing you did wrong is writing 9.8 instead of g. If you go back and fix that and do a little algebra you'll see you already have the same answer as in the image.
 
I'm not sure why you think that's wrong, I didn't forget halfway through the problem that they are the same..
 
1MileCrash said:
I'm not sure why you think that's wrong, I didn't forget halfway through the problem that they are the same..

It's wrong because now you have to change 9.8 back to g and 4.9 back to g/2. Why didn't you just leave it g to begin with? That's what I mean by 'wrong'. It's sort of a tactical error. You're making life complicated by leaving numbers floating around instead of 'g'.
 
Not sure, I just wrote it that way without thinking. What I meant was that I didn't get to the end and say "they have g where I have 9.8, what is going on."
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top