Conceptual question on the expansion postulate

Void123
Messages
138
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This isn't a homework question, but here goes:

Suppose I have a system in an initial state |\Psi_{initial}> within the basis {|\Phi_{n}>} and later on I have a final state |\Psi_{final}> within the same basis, and I want to know the probability of ending up in the latter state.

Now, since <\Phi_{n}|\Psi> = c_{n}, would the probability just be |<\Psi_{final}|\Psi_{initial}>|^{2}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Er...isn't the final state defined such that your system is in the "final" state at the end? ...

What you have there is the probability that the final state "is still the initial state".
 
I see what your'e saying, but the wording confuses me. For the question is "what is the probability that you end up in the final state." If we had been given a different problem with an initial wavefunction (for the infinite square well, for example) and instead we were asked "what is the probability that the particle will be found in the ground state", then we would naturally say <\phi_{1}|\Psi(x)>. So, to the laymen, wouldn't it seem logical to ask what is \Psi_{final} acting on the ket of \Psi_{initial}?
 
Last edited:
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top