I Condition for a pair of straight lines

rajeshmarndi
Messages
319
Reaction score
0
While determining the condition for the pair of straight line equation

##ax^2+2hxy+by^2+2gx+2fy+c=0##

or ##ax2+2(hy+g)x+(by^2+2fy+c)=0 ## (quadratic in x)

##x = \frac{-2(hy+g)}{2a} ± \frac{√((hy+g)^2-a(by^2+2fy+c))}{2a}##

The terms inside square root need to be a perfect square and it is in quadratic in y i.e ## √[(h^2-ab)y^2+2(hg-af)y+(g^2-ac)]##
or ##√[Ay^2+By+C] = √[(√Ay+\frac{B}{2√A})^2-\frac{B^2-4AC}{2A}]##.
Hence the condition is taken as ## B^2-4AC=0 ##.

My question even if ## B^2-4AC≠0 ##, the term inside square root can still be a perfect square e.g ##4^2-7=3^2, 6^2-11=5^2,23^2-45=22^2## and so on...

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"Perfect square" doesn't refer to integers here, it means the square root has to simplify to m*y+c for some m,c. It does so only if you can write the expression under the root as (m*y+c)2, which means the absolute term that is left over has to be zero.
 
  • Like
Likes HallsofIvy, Abhishek11235, WWGD and 1 other person
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
Back
Top