Conditional exponential distribution and exponential evidence

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
Mindscrape
Messages
1,854
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


This is a subset of a larger problem I'm working on, but once I get over this hang up I should be good to go. I have a set of measurements [itex]x_n[/itex] that are exponentially distributed

[tex]p(x_n|t)=e^{-(x_n-t)} I_{[x_n \ge t]}[/tex]

and I know that t is exponentially distributed as

[tex]p(t)=e^{-t}I_{[t\ge0]}[/tex]


Homework Equations


marginal probability
[tex]p(x)=\int p(x|t) p(t) dt[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


So the probability of N observations of x are
[tex]p(\mathbf{x}|t)=e^{-s(x)} e^{Nt} I_{[\textrm{min}(x_n) \ge t]}[/tex]
where
[tex]s(x)=\sum_{n=1}^N x_n[/tex]

Which means that
[tex]p(\mathbf{x},t)=e^{-s(x)} e^{t(N-1)} I_{[\textrm{min}(x_n) \ge t]} I_{[t\ge0]}[/tex]

If I want to find p(x) it should be
[tex]p(\mathbf{x})=\int_0^{x_{min}} e^{-s(x)}e^{t(N-1)} I_{[\textrm{min}(x_n) \ge t]}I_{[t\ge0]} dt[/tex]
[tex]p(\mathbf{x})=e^{-s(x)}\frac{1}{N-1}e^{t(N-1)}|^{t=x_{min}}_{t=0}I_{[\textrm{min}(x_n) \ge t]}I_{[t\ge0]}[/tex]
[tex]p(\mathbf{x})=e^{-s(x)}\frac{1}{N-1}I_{[\textrm{min}(x_n) \ge t]}I_{[t\ge0]}(e^{x_{min}(N-1)}-1)[/tex]

The issue is that this function isn't normalized. Are my limits wrong, or should I renormalize?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Mindscrape said:

Homework Statement


This is a subset of a larger problem I'm working on, but once I get over this hang up I should be good to go. I have a set of measurements [itex]x_n[/itex] that are exponentially distributed

[tex]p(x_n|t)=e^{-(x_n-t)} I_{[x_n \ge t]}[/tex]

and I know that t is exponentially distributed as

[tex]p(t)=e^{-t}I_{[t\ge0]}[/tex]


Homework Equations


marginal probability
[tex]p(x)=\int p(x|t) p(t) dt[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


So the probability of N observations of x are
[tex]p(\mathbf{x}|t)=e^{-s(x)} e^{Nt} I_{[\textrm{min}(x_n) \ge t]}[/tex]
where
[tex]s(x)=\sum_{n=1}^N x_n[/tex]

Which means that
[tex]p(\mathbf{x},t)=e^{-s(x)} e^{t(N-1)} I_{[\textrm{min}(x_n) \ge t]} I_{[t\ge0]}[/tex]

If I want to find p(x) it should be
[tex]p(\mathbf{x})=\int_0^{x_{min}} e^{-s(x)}e^{t(N-1)} I_{[\textrm{min}(x_n) \ge t]}I_{[t\ge0]} dt[/tex]
[tex]p(\mathbf{x})=e^{-s(x)}\frac{1}{N-1}e^{t(N-1)}|^{t=x_{min}}_{t=0}I_{[\textrm{min}(x_n) \ge t]}I_{[t\ge0]}[/tex]
[tex]p(\mathbf{x})=e^{-s(x)}\frac{1}{N-1}I_{[\textrm{min}(x_n) \ge t]}I_{[t\ge0]}(e^{x_{min}(N-1)}-1)[/tex]

The issue is that this function isn't normalized. Are my limits wrong, or should I renormalize?

The formula for ##p(\mathbf{x})## should not have ##t## in it.

Anyway, why would you need to re-normalize? Your ##p(\mathbf{x})## integrates to 1 when integrated over ##\mathbb{R}_{+}^N##. If you don't believe it, try the simple cases of N = 2 and N = 3 first.