How to write the complex exponential in terms of sine/cosine?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around expressing complex exponentials in terms of sine and cosine using Euler's formula. The original poster presents a problem involving the conversion of specific exponential expressions into trigonometric forms, referencing the relationships between exponential and trigonometric functions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to convert complex exponentials into sine and cosine forms, expressing concerns about the complexity of their solution and whether they are missing key conversions.
  • Some participants suggest alternative methods for simplifying the expressions and question the treatment of variables like k and t, particularly regarding their assumed real values.
  • There is discussion about the formatting of LaTeX and its impact on clarity in the presentation of mathematical expressions.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, offering suggestions for simplification and clarification. Some have provided guidance on formatting and expressing functions in LaTeX, while others are exploring different approaches to the problem without reaching a consensus on a single method.

Contextual Notes

There are mentions of specific assumptions regarding the nature of the variables involved, such as whether k and t are real numbers. The discussion also highlights the importance of proper mathematical notation in conveying ideas effectively.

Selling Papayas
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I apologize in advance if any formatting is weird; this is my first time posting. If I am breaking any rules with the formatting or if I am not providing enough detail or if I am in the wrong sub-forum, please let me know.

1. Homework Statement

Using Euler's formula : ejx = cos(x) + jsin(x) and the exponential representations of sin & cos, which are derived from Euler's formula:

##\displaystyle \sin(x)=\frac {e^{jx} - e^{-jx}} {2j}##
##\displaystyle \cos(x)=\frac {e^{jx} + e^{-jx}} {2}##
write the following in terms of sin & cos:
  1. ##\displaystyle je^{j \frac {π} {4}t} - je^{-j \frac {π} {4}t} + 2e^{j \frac {5π} {4}t} + 2e^{-j \frac {5π} {4}t}##
  2. ##\displaystyle \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1-e^{-jkπ})^2##

Homework Equations


I posted the ones given in the problem in part 1, and the only other one I used is ##j = e^{j \frac {π} {2}}##
This is probably obvious, but my classes use j instead of i to represent the imaginary number.

The Attempt at a Solution


So for part 1, I think I solved it counter-intuitively (Wolfram Alpha says my solution is equivalent but its extremely long and I still feel as if I'm missing some key conversion)
I converted the j's into ##e^j\frac{π}{2}##, multiplied the exponentials together (adding the exponents in each term) and ended up with the following:
##[\cos(\frac {π} {2} + \frac {π} {4}t) + j\sin(\frac {π} {2} + \frac {π} {4}t)] - [\cos(\frac {π} {2} - \frac {π} {4}t) + j\sin(\frac {π} {2} - \frac {π} {4}t)] + 2[\cos(\frac {5π} {4}t) + j\sin(\frac {5π} {4}t)] + 2[\cos(\frac {-5π} {4}t) + j\sin(\frac {-5π} {4}t)]##​
As you can see, it's a lot, but I am confident I at least have a right solution.

For part 2, I am getting stumped pretty quickly. I've tried to apply the methods I used in part 1 to solve this, but can't seem to pull out the k and the π from the denominator.
What I've done so far:
##\displaystyle \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1-e^{-jkπ})^2##
##\displaystyle= \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1-e^{-jkπ})(1-e^{-jkπ})##
##\displaystyle= \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1 - 2e^{-jkπ} + e^{-2jkπ})##
##\displaystyle= \frac {3} {4jkπ} - \frac {3e^{-jkπ}} {2jkπ} + \frac{3e^{-2jkπ}} {4jkπ}##​
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I fixed it. Sorry, took a while.
 
fresh_42 said:
I fixed it. Sorry, took a while.
Oh I was fixing it too. I think we were clashing; my bad! I thought I was going crazy or saving it wrong.
 
Selling Papayas said:
I apologize in advance if any formatting is weird; this is my first time posting. If I am breaking any rules with the formatting or if I am not providing enough detail or if I am in the wrong sub-forum, please let me know.

1. Homework Statement

Using Euler's formula : ejx = cos(x) + jsin(x) and the exponential representations of sin & cos, which are derived from Euler's formula:

##\displaystyle sin(x)=\frac {e^{jx} - e^{-jx}} {2j}##
##\displaystyle cos(x)=\frac {e^{jx} + e^{-jx}} {2}##
write the following in terms of sin & cos:
  1. ##\displaystyle je^{j \frac {π} {4}t} - je^{-j \frac {π} {4}t} + 2e^{j \frac {5π} {4}t} + 2e^{-j \frac {5π} {4}t}##
  2. ##\displaystyle \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1-e^{-jkπ})^2##

Homework Equations


I posted the ones given in the problem in part 1, and the only other one I used is ##j = e^{j \frac {π} {2}}##
This is probably obvious, but my classes use j instead of i to represent the imaginary number.

The Attempt at a Solution


So for part 1, I think I solved it counter-intuitively (Wolfram Alpha says my solution is equivalent but its extremely long and I still feel as if I'm missing some key conversion)
I converted the j's into ##e^j\frac{π}{2}##, multiplied the exponentials together (adding the exponents in each term) and ended up with the following:
##[cos(\frac {π} {2} + \frac {pi} {4}t) + jsin(\frac {π} {2} + \frac {pi} {4}t)] - [cos(\frac {π} {2} - \frac {pi} {4}t) + jsin(\frac {π} {2} - \frac {pi} {4}t)] + 2[cos(\frac {5π} {4}t) + jsin(\frac {5π} {4}t)] + 2[cos(\frac {-5π} {4}t) + jsin(\frac {-5π} {4}t)]##​
As you can see, it's a lot, but I am confident I at least have a right solution.

For part 2, I am getting stumped pretty quickly. I've tried to apply the methods I used in part 1 to solve this, but can't seem to pull out the k and the π from the denominator.
What I've done so far:
##\displaystyle \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1-e^{-jkπ})^2##
##\displaystyle= \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1-e^{-jkπ})(1-e^{-jkπ})##
##\displaystyle= \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1 - 2e^{-jkπ} + e^{-2jkπ})##
##\displaystyle= \frac {3} {4jkπ} - \frac {3e^{-jkπ}} {2jkπ} + \frac{3e^{-2jkπ}} {4jkπ}##​

For (a): it is much, much easier to NOT expand out the ##j## as ##\exp(j \pi/2)##. Assuming you intend ##t## to be real, we have:
$$\text{your function} = j \times 2j \sin(\pi t/4) + 2 \times 2 \cos(5 \pi t/4).$$
That simplifies even more. Of course, it becomes more complicated if ##t## is complex.

For (b): again, assuming ##k## is real, you can either express ##\exp(-j k \pi)## in terms of ##\sin(k \pi), \cos(k \pi)## then square it all out to get an answer in terms of ##\sin(k \pi), \cos(k \pi), \sin^2(k \pi), \cos^2(k \pi)##, or else expand out the ##(1-\exp(-j k \pi) )^2## first, then get an answer in terms of ##\sin(k \pi), \cos(k \pi), \sin(2 k \pi), \cos(2 k \pi)##. The choice is up to you, and both are equally valid. Of course the ##k## and ##\pi## cannot be taken out of the denominator; there is no reason to suppose they can or should be taken out.

Again, everything is much more complicated if ##k## is not real.

BTW: your expressions will look much better if you use the LaTeX standard of typing "\sin" instead of "sin" and "\cos" instead of "cos". Here is the difference: ##\sin \theta## instead of ##sin \theta## and ##\cos \theta## instead of ##cos \theta##. TeX/LaTeX does not recognize "cos" as a standard mathematical function, it just thinks it is a "c" followed by an "o" followed by an "s".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and Selling Papayas
Ray Vickson said:
For (a): it is much, much easier to NOT expand out the ##j## as ##\exp(j \pi/2)##. Assuming you intend ##t## to be real, we have:
$$\text{your function} = j \times 2j \sin(\pi t/4) + 2 \times 2 \cos(5 \pi t/4).$$
That simplifies even more. Of course, it becomes more complicated if ##t## is complex.

For (b): again, assuming ##k## is real, you can either express ##\exp(-j k \pi)## in terms of ##\sin(k \pi), \cos(k \pi)## then square it all out to get an answer in terms of ##\sin(k \pi), \cos(k \pi), \sin^2(k \pi), \cos^2(k \pi)##, or else expand out the ##(1-\exp(-j k \pi) )^2## first, then get an answer in terms of ##\sin(k \pi), \cos(k \pi), \sin(2 k \pi), \cos(2 k \pi)##. The choice is up to you, and both are equally valid. Of course the ##k## and ##\pi## cannot be taken out of the denominator; there is no reason to suppose they can or should be taken out.

Again, everything is much more complicated if ##k## is not real.

BTW: your expressions will look much better if you use the LaTeX standard of typing "\sin" instead of "sin" and "\cos" instead of "cos". Here is the difference: ##\sin \theta## instead of ##sin \theta## and ##\cos \theta## instead of ##cos \theta##. TeX/LaTeX does not recognize "cos" as a standard mathematical function, it just thinks it is a "c" followed by an "o" followed by an "s".

Hey thank you so much for the quick response! I used your advice and got a way cleaner answer for #1 (basically the same thing as you, I just distributed the j and the 2). As far as I know, we can assume t and k is real (not sure if they have to be integers or not). For #2, I'm still not sure if I have a simple enough answer. I think I understand what you told me, but is there just not a way to convert every j or coefficient into a type of sine or cosine? I'm getting:
##\displaystyle \frac {3} {4jπk} - \frac {3 \cos(πk)} {2jπk} + \frac {3 \sin(πk)} {2kπ} + \frac {3 \cos(2kπ)} {4jkπ} - \frac {3 \sin(2kπ)} {4πk}##​
 
Last edited:
Selling Papayas said:
Hey thank you so much for the quick response! I used your advice and got a way cleaner answer for #1 (basically the same thing as you, I just distributed the j and the 2). As far as I know, we can assume t and k is real (not sure if they have to be integers or not). For #2, I'm still not sure if I have a simple enough answer. I think I understand what you told me, but is there just not a way to convert every j or coefficient into a type of sine or cosine? I'm getting:
##\displaystyle \frac {3} {4jπk} - \frac {3 \cos(πk)} {2jπk} + \frac {3 \sin(πk)} {2kπ} + \frac {3 \cos(2kπ)} {4jkπ} - \frac {3 \sin(2kπ)} {4πk}##​
One final refinement: it is usual to write a complex number as ##a + j b##, so if you have it in the form ##c + \frac{d}{j}## you should convert it (to put the "## j ##" in the numerator instead of the denominator). Writing ##c + \frac{d}{j}## is not wrong, but it does go against the world-wide standard.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Selling Papayas

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K