How to write the complex exponential in terms of sine/cosine?

Selling Papayas
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I apologize in advance if any formatting is weird; this is my first time posting. If I am breaking any rules with the formatting or if I am not providing enough detail or if I am in the wrong sub-forum, please let me know.

1. Homework Statement

Using Euler's formula : ejx = cos(x) + jsin(x) and the exponential representations of sin & cos, which are derived from Euler's formula:

##\displaystyle \sin(x)=\frac {e^{jx} - e^{-jx}} {2j}##
##\displaystyle \cos(x)=\frac {e^{jx} + e^{-jx}} {2}##
write the following in terms of sin & cos:
  1. ##\displaystyle je^{j \frac {π} {4}t} - je^{-j \frac {π} {4}t} + 2e^{j \frac {5π} {4}t} + 2e^{-j \frac {5π} {4}t}##
  2. ##\displaystyle \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1-e^{-jkπ})^2##

Homework Equations


I posted the ones given in the problem in part 1, and the only other one I used is ##j = e^{j \frac {π} {2}}##
This is probably obvious, but my classes use j instead of i to represent the imaginary number.

The Attempt at a Solution


So for part 1, I think I solved it counter-intuitively (Wolfram Alpha says my solution is equivalent but its extremely long and I still feel as if I'm missing some key conversion)
I converted the j's into ##e^j\frac{π}{2}##, multiplied the exponentials together (adding the exponents in each term) and ended up with the following:
##[\cos(\frac {π} {2} + \frac {π} {4}t) + j\sin(\frac {π} {2} + \frac {π} {4}t)] - [\cos(\frac {π} {2} - \frac {π} {4}t) + j\sin(\frac {π} {2} - \frac {π} {4}t)] + 2[\cos(\frac {5π} {4}t) + j\sin(\frac {5π} {4}t)] + 2[\cos(\frac {-5π} {4}t) + j\sin(\frac {-5π} {4}t)]##​
As you can see, it's a lot, but I am confident I at least have a right solution.

For part 2, I am getting stumped pretty quickly. I've tried to apply the methods I used in part 1 to solve this, but can't seem to pull out the k and the π from the denominator.
What I've done so far:
##\displaystyle \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1-e^{-jkπ})^2##
##\displaystyle= \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1-e^{-jkπ})(1-e^{-jkπ})##
##\displaystyle= \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1 - 2e^{-jkπ} + e^{-2jkπ})##
##\displaystyle= \frac {3} {4jkπ} - \frac {3e^{-jkπ}} {2jkπ} + \frac{3e^{-2jkπ}} {4jkπ}##​
 
Last edited:
I fixed it. Sorry, took a while.
 
fresh_42 said:
I fixed it. Sorry, took a while.
Oh I was fixing it too. I think we were clashing; my bad! I thought I was going crazy or saving it wrong.
 
Selling Papayas said:
I apologize in advance if any formatting is weird; this is my first time posting. If I am breaking any rules with the formatting or if I am not providing enough detail or if I am in the wrong sub-forum, please let me know.

1. Homework Statement

Using Euler's formula : ejx = cos(x) + jsin(x) and the exponential representations of sin & cos, which are derived from Euler's formula:

##\displaystyle sin(x)=\frac {e^{jx} - e^{-jx}} {2j}##
##\displaystyle cos(x)=\frac {e^{jx} + e^{-jx}} {2}##
write the following in terms of sin & cos:
  1. ##\displaystyle je^{j \frac {π} {4}t} - je^{-j \frac {π} {4}t} + 2e^{j \frac {5π} {4}t} + 2e^{-j \frac {5π} {4}t}##
  2. ##\displaystyle \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1-e^{-jkπ})^2##

Homework Equations


I posted the ones given in the problem in part 1, and the only other one I used is ##j = e^{j \frac {π} {2}}##
This is probably obvious, but my classes use j instead of i to represent the imaginary number.

The Attempt at a Solution


So for part 1, I think I solved it counter-intuitively (Wolfram Alpha says my solution is equivalent but its extremely long and I still feel as if I'm missing some key conversion)
I converted the j's into ##e^j\frac{π}{2}##, multiplied the exponentials together (adding the exponents in each term) and ended up with the following:
##[cos(\frac {π} {2} + \frac {pi} {4}t) + jsin(\frac {π} {2} + \frac {pi} {4}t)] - [cos(\frac {π} {2} - \frac {pi} {4}t) + jsin(\frac {π} {2} - \frac {pi} {4}t)] + 2[cos(\frac {5π} {4}t) + jsin(\frac {5π} {4}t)] + 2[cos(\frac {-5π} {4}t) + jsin(\frac {-5π} {4}t)]##​
As you can see, it's a lot, but I am confident I at least have a right solution.

For part 2, I am getting stumped pretty quickly. I've tried to apply the methods I used in part 1 to solve this, but can't seem to pull out the k and the π from the denominator.
What I've done so far:
##\displaystyle \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1-e^{-jkπ})^2##
##\displaystyle= \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1-e^{-jkπ})(1-e^{-jkπ})##
##\displaystyle= \frac {3} {4jkπ} (1 - 2e^{-jkπ} + e^{-2jkπ})##
##\displaystyle= \frac {3} {4jkπ} - \frac {3e^{-jkπ}} {2jkπ} + \frac{3e^{-2jkπ}} {4jkπ}##​

For (a): it is much, much easier to NOT expand out the ##j## as ##\exp(j \pi/2)##. Assuming you intend ##t## to be real, we have:
$$\text{your function} = j \times 2j \sin(\pi t/4) + 2 \times 2 \cos(5 \pi t/4).$$
That simplifies even more. Of course, it becomes more complicated if ##t## is complex.

For (b): again, assuming ##k## is real, you can either express ##\exp(-j k \pi)## in terms of ##\sin(k \pi), \cos(k \pi)## then square it all out to get an answer in terms of ##\sin(k \pi), \cos(k \pi), \sin^2(k \pi), \cos^2(k \pi)##, or else expand out the ##(1-\exp(-j k \pi) )^2## first, then get an answer in terms of ##\sin(k \pi), \cos(k \pi), \sin(2 k \pi), \cos(2 k \pi)##. The choice is up to you, and both are equally valid. Of course the ##k## and ##\pi## cannot be taken out of the denominator; there is no reason to suppose they can or should be taken out.

Again, everything is much more complicated if ##k## is not real.

BTW: your expressions will look much better if you use the LaTeX standard of typing "\sin" instead of "sin" and "\cos" instead of "cos". Here is the difference: ##\sin \theta## instead of ##sin \theta## and ##\cos \theta## instead of ##cos \theta##. TeX/LaTeX does not recognize "cos" as a standard mathematical function, it just thinks it is a "c" followed by an "o" followed by an "s".
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and Selling Papayas
Ray Vickson said:
For (a): it is much, much easier to NOT expand out the ##j## as ##\exp(j \pi/2)##. Assuming you intend ##t## to be real, we have:
$$\text{your function} = j \times 2j \sin(\pi t/4) + 2 \times 2 \cos(5 \pi t/4).$$
That simplifies even more. Of course, it becomes more complicated if ##t## is complex.

For (b): again, assuming ##k## is real, you can either express ##\exp(-j k \pi)## in terms of ##\sin(k \pi), \cos(k \pi)## then square it all out to get an answer in terms of ##\sin(k \pi), \cos(k \pi), \sin^2(k \pi), \cos^2(k \pi)##, or else expand out the ##(1-\exp(-j k \pi) )^2## first, then get an answer in terms of ##\sin(k \pi), \cos(k \pi), \sin(2 k \pi), \cos(2 k \pi)##. The choice is up to you, and both are equally valid. Of course the ##k## and ##\pi## cannot be taken out of the denominator; there is no reason to suppose they can or should be taken out.

Again, everything is much more complicated if ##k## is not real.

BTW: your expressions will look much better if you use the LaTeX standard of typing "\sin" instead of "sin" and "\cos" instead of "cos". Here is the difference: ##\sin \theta## instead of ##sin \theta## and ##\cos \theta## instead of ##cos \theta##. TeX/LaTeX does not recognize "cos" as a standard mathematical function, it just thinks it is a "c" followed by an "o" followed by an "s".

Hey thank you so much for the quick response! I used your advice and got a way cleaner answer for #1 (basically the same thing as you, I just distributed the j and the 2). As far as I know, we can assume t and k is real (not sure if they have to be integers or not). For #2, I'm still not sure if I have a simple enough answer. I think I understand what you told me, but is there just not a way to convert every j or coefficient into a type of sine or cosine? I'm getting:
##\displaystyle \frac {3} {4jπk} - \frac {3 \cos(πk)} {2jπk} + \frac {3 \sin(πk)} {2kπ} + \frac {3 \cos(2kπ)} {4jkπ} - \frac {3 \sin(2kπ)} {4πk}##​
 
Last edited:
Selling Papayas said:
Hey thank you so much for the quick response! I used your advice and got a way cleaner answer for #1 (basically the same thing as you, I just distributed the j and the 2). As far as I know, we can assume t and k is real (not sure if they have to be integers or not). For #2, I'm still not sure if I have a simple enough answer. I think I understand what you told me, but is there just not a way to convert every j or coefficient into a type of sine or cosine? I'm getting:
##\displaystyle \frac {3} {4jπk} - \frac {3 \cos(πk)} {2jπk} + \frac {3 \sin(πk)} {2kπ} + \frac {3 \cos(2kπ)} {4jkπ} - \frac {3 \sin(2kπ)} {4πk}##​
One final refinement: it is usual to write a complex number as ##a + j b##, so if you have it in the form ##c + \frac{d}{j}## you should convert it (to put the "## j ##" in the numerator instead of the denominator). Writing ##c + \frac{d}{j}## is not wrong, but it does go against the world-wide standard.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Selling Papayas

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K