Conduction band splitting under spin/orbit coupling

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the phenomenon of conduction band splitting under spin-orbit coupling, highlighting that valence bands experience significant splitting due to relativistic effects, while conduction bands exhibit minimal or negligible splitting. The tight-binding calculations confirm that conduction bands have smaller splitting compared to valence bands, attributed to the proximity of valence electrons to the nucleus, which results in stronger magnetic forces. The conversation also references the role of atomic number in influencing the magnitude of spin-orbit splitting, particularly in semiconductors like silicon and germanium.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spin-orbit coupling in solid-state physics
  • Familiarity with tight-binding calculations
  • Knowledge of relativistic effects on electron behavior
  • Basic concepts of band structure in semiconductors
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the principles of spin-orbit coupling in detail
  • Investigate tight-binding models and their applications in band structure analysis
  • Study the effects of atomic number on spin-orbit splitting in various materials
  • Learn about the role of electron proximity to the nucleus in energy level splitting
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and engineers interested in solid-state physics, particularly those studying semiconductor properties and spin-orbit interactions.

easytool
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi,

Does anyone have an intuitive idea of why it is always the valence bands split under spin/orbit coupling, but not conduction band? (or a much smaller splitting than valence band)

I know through tight-binding calculations, if I plug in numbers correctly, conduction bands always have tiny splitting, but intuitively why conduction band splitting is so much different from valence band?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wild guess here, but wouldn't it have to do with larger angular momentum of the states composing the valence band?
 
easytool said:
Hi,

Does anyone have an intuitive idea of why it is always the valence bands split under spin/orbit coupling, but not conduction band? (or a much smaller splitting than valence band)

I know through tight-binding calculations, if I plug in numbers correctly, conduction bands always have tiny splitting, but intuitively why conduction band splitting is so much different from valence band?

Thanks!

Maybe a quasiclassical explanation will suffice.

The large splitting of the valence band is a relativistic effect. It is a little like the precession of an orbit.

It is because the electrons of the valence band are closer to the nucleus then the electrons of the conduction band. In a quasi-classical approximation, the electrons near the nucleus move faster than the electrons farther from the nucleus. Because the electrons are moving faster near the nucleus, the magnetic force on the electrons are greater near the nucleus. The magnetic force on the electrons causes the splitting in energy levels.

Here is a link and quote on this.

http://www.nd.edu/~djena/kdotp.pdf

“ What is spin-orbit interaction? First, we have to understand that it is a purely relativistic effect (which immediately implies there will be a speed of light c somewhere!). Putting it in words, when electrons move around the positively charged nucleus at relativistic speeds, the electric field of the nucleus Lorentz-transforms to a magnetic field seen by the electrons. The transformation is given by <variation on Lorentz force equation>

where the approximation is for v << c. To give you an idea, consider a Hydrogen atom - the velocity of electron in the ground state is v ≈ _c where _ = 1/137 is the fine structure constant, and the consequent magnetic field seen by such an electron (rotating at a radius r0 = 0.53°A) from the nucleus is - hold your breath - 12 Tesla! That is a very large field, and should have perceivable effects.

Spin-orbit splitting occurs in the band structure of crystal precisely due to this effect. Specifically, it occurs in semiconductors in the valence band, because the valence electrons are very close to the nucleus, just like electrons around the proton in the hydrogen atom. Furthermore, we can make some predictions about the magnitude of splitting - in general, the splitting should be more for crystals whose constituent atoms have higher atomic number - since the nuclei have more protons, hence more field!”

It is a little like the precession of the orbit of Mercury in GR. The reason the precession is so much larger for mercury is because Mercury is so close to the sun. Mercury moves faster, so relativistic effects become important.

I’ll bet you didn’t expect to see relativity in solid state physics!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thank you, Darwin123! your answer was useful for me too!
 
I am not sure whether the statement of the OP is true. Take silicon: The interesting bands at the gamma point are either formed from p or from s orbitals. The valence band is formed from p orbitals with l=1 so that under SO coupling two bands with j=3/2 and j=1/2 are formed. The lowest conduction band is also p so that I would expect a similar if not a larger splitting. However, SO-coupling is small in Si, and the effect isn't important anyhow, and I don't know it's size.
In Ge, where SO coupling is much stronger, the lowest conduction band is formed from s-orbitals with l=0 and only one band with j=1/2 arises. So the lowest conduction band can clearly not be split.
 
Thank you Darwin123 !

A good lesson I learned here: The eigenvectors from tight-binding calculation is as important as eigen-energies ! The latter gives the band structure, while the eigenvectors tell one the orbital composition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K