Conductors in Electrostatic Equilibrium problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the total charge on the Earth's surface and the charge density at an altitude of 250 m, given an electric field of 150 N/C near the surface and 120 N/C at altitude. The initial calculations for charge density yield a value of 4.25 x 10^-12 C/m^3, which contradicts the textbook answer of 1 x 10^-12 C/m^3. Participants clarify that the charge density referenced in the textbook is volumetric, while the calculations may have mistakenly used surface area. Suggestions include considering the contribution of both Earth's charge and any charge present in the air to accurately determine the net electric field and charge density. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the context of charge density in relation to the problem.
dimpledur
Messages
193
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In fair weather, over flat ground, there is a downward electric field of about 150 N/C. A) assume that the Earth is a conducting sphere with charge on its surface. If the electric field just outside is 150 N/C pointing radially inwards, calculate the total charge on the Earth's surface. B) at an altitude of of 250 m above the Earth's surface, the field is only 120 N/C. Calculate the charge density.

Homework Equations



E=\frac{k\left|q\right|} {r^2}

\rho=\frac{q} {V}

The Attempt at a Solution



I only need help with part b)

\left|q\right|=\frac{Er^2} {k}

\left|q\right|=\frac{(120 N/C)[6.371(10)^6 m +250 m]^2} {8.99(10)^9 Nm/C^2}

\left|q\right|=5.42(10)^5 C

We then have,

\rho=\frac{5.42(10)^5 C} {(4/3)(\pi)[(6.371(10)^6 m +250 m)^3-(6.371(10)^6 m)^3]}

\rho=4.25(10)^{-12} C/m^3

However, the answer should be \rho=1(10)^{-12} C/m^3 according to the back of the book. Suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
\rho is surface charge density not volumetric.

Use \rho = q/(surface area)
 
In my textbook \rho is for volumetric charge density.. Additionally, the answer is given per unit volume, so surface area is not suffice.
 
dimpledur said:
Calculate the charge density.

Who's density are they talking about?
 
I'm assuming that they want to know the charge density of the air
 
well if there's charge in air also and you need only density in air then net E at 120m is due to both charge on Earth and air in between.

So find field due to Earth at 250m above Earth and subtract it form E given and then find ρ
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top