Confirming an observation about Newton's Laws

AI Thread Summary
In a frictionless inclined plane scenario, the velocity of an object going up will equal its velocity on the way back down, assuming no energy losses. This is due to the conservation of mechanical energy, where the only force acting is the component of weight parallel to the incline. The acceleration remains constant at g(sin theta), where theta is the angle of the incline. It's important to note that while speed remains the same, the direction of motion changes. Thus, the final speed at the bottom will match the initial speed when the object was projected up.
frankfjf
Messages
166
Reaction score
0
When approaching a problem concerning Newton's 2nd law of motion, if I'm dealing with a frictionless inclined plane and know the velocity of an object going up the plane, is it safe to say that the velocity will be the same on the way back down since no friction is present?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is of course assuming that the object, such as a block, is projected up the plane then allowed to slide back down, and I know the velocity it used to go up the incline.
 
frankfjf said:
is it safe to say that the velocity will be the same on the way back down since no friction is present?
Yes, since mechanical energy is conserved. For the same reason, if you toss a ball upward at some speed, when it falls back down it will have the same speed (ignoring air resistance). (Nitpick: Of course it's the speed that's the same, not the velocity, since the direction of motion is reversed on the way down.)
 
Edit: Darn it DocAl, I was answering this one! Well, this is what I wrote:

Yes (I assume you meant that the final speed at the bottom will be the same as the initial speed as it starts up the incline). Since there is no friction, the only the componant of the weight that is parallel to the surface will act. This means, if the plane is at a constant angle, the acceleration will be a constant g(sin theta), where theta is the angle of incline. Also, from an energy point of view, since no frictional forces are present, mechanical energy is conserved.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top