Confirming: Total & Kinetic Energy of an Object in Orbit

AI Thread Summary
In an orbit around Earth, the total energy of an object is indeed equal to half of its gravitational potential energy (Eg). The kinetic energy (Ek) can be calculated using the formula Ek = 1/2mv^2, where v is the orbital velocity. This velocity differs from linear velocity, as it accounts for the circular motion of the object. The relationship between gravitational force and centripetal force leads to Kepler's law for circular orbits, confirming that Ek equals -Eg/2. This reflects the conservation of energy principle, where total energy remains constant in the system.
decamij
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Just want to confirm. If an object is in orbit,, around earth, for example, the its total energy is equal to half of its Eg. But what is its kinetic energy equal to? Is there another expression rather than Ek = 1/2mv^2?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For circular motion:

E_k = \frac{1}{2}m\frac{(2 \pi r)^2}{T^2}

With T the period of the orbital motion. Now if you equate the gravitational force to the centripetal force mv^2/r and use the same expression as above for the velocity you get:

T^2=\frac{(2 \pi r)^2 r}{GM}

Wich is Keplers law for circular orbits. Filling this expression in the kinetic energy expression:

E_k = \frac{GMm}{2r}=-\frac{E_g}{2}

This shouldn't be too surprising as total energy is kinetic + potential energy and you already noticed this equalled half the potential energy.
E_{pot}=E_g=-G\frac{Mm}{r}
 


Yes, you are correct in that the total energy of an object in orbit is equal to half of its gravitational potential energy (Eg). This is known as the conservation of energy principle, where the total energy of a system remains constant.

The kinetic energy (Ek) of an object in orbit can be calculated using the formula Ek = 1/2mv^2, where m is the mass of the object and v is its velocity. This equation represents the energy that an object possesses due to its motion.

There is no other expression for kinetic energy in this scenario as it is a fundamental concept in physics. However, it is important to note that the velocity in this equation is the orbital velocity, which is different from the linear velocity of the object. The orbital velocity takes into account the circular motion of the object around the Earth.

I hope this helps to clarify your understanding. Keep up the good work!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top