Confirming Trigonometric Equation Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter sarah786
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Trigonometric
sarah786
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
i have solved some questions but my answers don't match with the solution list i have in my book... please if you help me check my answers, i'll be very grateful..

√3 tan x - sec x - 1 = 0 ... i get three solutions to this question but my book's got two... it doesn't mention 5pi/3 + 2n*pi... do u think this is also a soln to this question??

sin2x + sin x = 0 ... one of the solutions that i get is 4pi/3 + 2n*pi ... my book doesn't mention this... am i correct??

sin 4x - sin 2x = cos 3x ... one of the solutions that i get is pi/2 + 2n*pi/3 ... am i right?

sin x + sin 3x + sin 5x = 0 ... are pi/3 + 2n*pi and 2n*pi/3 also solutions to this eq. ??

LAST ONE :) ... sin θ + sin 3θ + sin 5θ + sin 7θ = 0 ... is 3*pi/4 + n*pi also a solution...

I really need to confirm the answers i am having my grand test tomorrow... i have tried them but not sure about the answers... i will be grateful forever if you confirm these... thanks :)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sarah786 said:
i have solved some questions but my answers don't match with the solution list i have in my book... please if you help me check my answers, i'll be very grateful..

√3 tan x - sec x - 1 = 0 ... i get three solutions to this question but my book's got two... it doesn't mention 5pi/3 + 2n*pi... do u think this is also a soln to this question??
5pi/3 + 2n*pi is not a solution. This is easy enough to check, using pi/3 for the reference angle. tan(pi/3) = √3, sec(pi/3) = 2, so tan(5pi/3) = -√3 and sec(5pi/3) = 2. Substituting into your equation gives
√3(-√3) - 2 - 1 = -3 - 2 - 1 = -6.

For the rest of your problems you should check them yourself. You've already done the hardest work. Checking your solutions involves determinining whether you get a true statement when you replace the variable in the equation by the value you're checking.
sarah786 said:
sin2x + sin x = 0 ... one of the solutions that i get is 4pi/3 + 2n*pi ... my book doesn't mention this... am i correct??

sin 4x - sin 2x = cos 3x ... one of the solutions that i get is pi/2 + 2n*pi/3 ... am i right?

sin x + sin 3x + sin 5x = 0 ... are pi/3 + 2n*pi and 2n*pi/3 also solutions to this eq. ??

LAST ONE :) ... sin θ + sin 3θ + sin 5θ + sin 7θ = 0 ... is 3*pi/4 + n*pi also a solution...

I really need to confirm the answers i am having my grand test tomorrow... i have tried them but not sure about the answers... i will be grateful forever if you confirm these... thanks :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top