Confused about answer key's solution to a work/energy problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter physics801
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around confusion regarding the solution to a work/energy problem in a physics placement exam. The original poster questions why the solution manual uses (x_{max} - x) instead of (x - x_{max}) when calculating work done against gravity on a ramp. Clarification is provided that the choice of positive direction is crucial; if gravity is considered negative along the slope, then the positive direction is up the slope, affecting the sign in the equation. The importance of consistently defining positive and negative directions in physics problems is emphasized, along with the necessity of checking the signs of results. Ultimately, the poster acknowledges the misunderstanding and appreciates the clarification.
physics801
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I'm studying for my college's physics placement and I'm frustrated because I don't get the solution to problem 1d.

Homework Statement



The problem is here: http://ocw.edu.ht/courses/physics/8-01-physics-i-classical-mechanics-fall-1999/exams/exam_2.pdf

Solution manual is here: http://ocw.edu.ht/courses/physics/8-01-physics-i-classical-mechanics-fall-1999/exams/quiz2_sol.pdf

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew a mspaint diagram of what I have: http://cl.ly/image/3b1o082l1k3a (x_{max} is defined in 1a, which is in the soln manual)

Basically since gravity is opposing the direction of travel (up the ramp), I think the solution to 1d(i) should be work=-mg(h-h_{max})=-mgsin\theta(x-x_{max}). However the solution manual has the same thing except x_{max}-x in the parentheses. Why is this? Shouldn't it be final - initial, which means x-x_{max} in the parentheses?

edit: I also have the same question for 1d(ii) and (iii) but hopefully it will be answered by explaining (i)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to decide which way is positive and stick to it.
If the force due to gravity is being taken as negative along the slope then the positive direction is up the slope. But x is measured down the slope, so it's (-x) - (-xmax)
It is always a good idea to sanity-check the sign of a result. It is clear that the work done by gravity here is negative.
 
Look at the direction of x, what does x mean in terms of the spring?
 
haruspex said:
You have to decide which way is positive and stick to it.
If the force due to gravity is being taken as negative along the slope then the positive direction is up the slope. But x is measured down the slope, so it's (-x) - (-xmax)
It is always a good idea to sanity-check the sign of a result. It is clear that the work done by gravity here is negative.

Oh whoops, I completely missed that. Thanks for the help!
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top