Confused about Mixtures and Substances? Get Help Now!

  • Thread starter Thread starter Imparcticle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mixture
AI Thread Summary
A mixture consists of two or more substances that are combined without a fixed composition, while a substance has a definite, fixed composition. Wood is classified as a mixture because it contains various chemicals and compounds, not a single chemical compound. Sodium chloride, commonly known as table salt, is considered a substance because it has a fixed chemical composition and cannot be physically separated into simpler components. The distinction lies in the ability to physically separate components; mixtures can be separated, whereas substances cannot. Understanding these definitions clarifies the confusion surrounding the classification of materials.
Imparcticle
Messages
572
Reaction score
4
A mixture is defined as 2 substances that are arbitirarily combined. They are either homogenous or heterogenous.

A substance is defined as being homogenous and has definite, fixed composition that is NOT arbitrary.

On some classwork we did, this following was stated as being true:

wood is a...answer: mixture

sodium chloride is a... answer: mixture

I disagree; wood is a substance because it has a fixed composition by definition. And since sodium chloride is a compound, it is not a mixture either; it is a substance.
the choices for classification on the worksheet was "mixture" or "substance".
I am confused...please help.

thanx
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wood is not a substance. There is no chemical compound that can be called "wood". A wood is a large mixture of various chemicals and compounds.
 
thank you!

How about sodium chloride then? it is a substance?
 
Yes.. its ordinary table salt.
 
Think of it this way, a substance can not be physicly broken down into somthing else.

A mixture can be physicly separated (Like filtering a mixture)
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top