Confused About Traveling at the Speed of Light?

binbots
Messages
170
Reaction score
3
I have always been confused about this. On here people constantly talk about traveling in a spaceship that goes .5c, or.9999c etc. But how can this be, no matter how fast one travels light will always travel at c compared to your reference frame. Does this not mean that no matter how fast you travel your speed will always equal 0 compared to light?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are correct. So the speed of a spaceship (or anything else, for that matter) is never measured with respect to the speed of light, it is always measured relative to stationary objects.
 
I don't think so. Your speed equals 300000 km/s compared to light.

Edit: Sorry binbots, I didn't understood your question. Russ is right.
 
Last edited:
binbots said:
I have always been confused about this. On here people constantly talk about traveling in a spaceship that goes .5c, or.9999c etc. But how can this be, no matter how fast one travels light will always travel at c compared to your reference frame. Does this not mean that no matter how fast you travel your speed will always equal 0 compared to light?
When people talk about a spaceship traveling at 0.5c or 0.9999c, they mean with respect to some other frame (say the earth). In that frame you are traveling at 0.5c or 0.9999c and light, of course, is traveling at c.

In your frame you are at rest and light travels at speed c with respect to you.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top