Confused by simple quantum problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter einai
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Quantum
einai
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
Hi, I came across a problem which seems to be pretty simple, but I'm stuck :confused: .

Given a Hamiltonian:
H=\frac{\vec{p}^2}{2m}+V(\vec{x})

If |E> is a bound state of the Hamiltonian with energy eigenvalue E, show that: <E| \vec{p} |E>=0

-----------------------------------
So I've been trying something like this:

\frac{1}{2m}<E|\vec{p} \cdot \vec{p}|E> + <E|V(\vec{x})|E> = E<E|E> = E

but I have no idea how to proceed from here.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Theres several ways to do this, one elegant way, one brute force way, one abstract mathematical way (probably not suitable if this is a first course).

I'll give you a hint on the brute force way. You are going to want to think of what the operator P is. Strictly speaking, in three dimensions it looks like

P = -i hbar * del. In one dimension its p = -i hbar d/dx

Use the Schroedinger formalism and plow away =)

The abstract method hint is to think of what P does to your state space. Hmm, it looks like a translational operator. Maybe what you are looking for is a statement of translational symmetry.
 
for a bound state, the wavefunction drops to zero at infinity, which allows you to use integration by parts to show that

\langle p\rangle=m\frac{d\langle x\rangle}{dt}

and in a stationary state (i.e. energy eigenvalue), all expectation values are time independent, so the derivative vanishes.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, Haelfix and lethe :redface: .

Haelfix said:
P = -i hbar * del. In one dimension its p = -i hbar d/dx

Use the Schroedinger formalism and plow away =)

I thought about using the operator form of p, but I wasn't sure how it acts on the energy eigenstate |E>. Can I just say that after it takes the x derivative of |E>, the state becomes orthorgonal to the original |E>, ie,

<E|-i\hbar \frac{d}{dx}|E> = <E|E'> =0

because |E'> is now orthorgonal to |E>?

Hmm...I don't think I'm doing the right thing.
 
Last edited:
I think I figured it out. I used the commutation relation p = - i m hbar*[H,x].
Thanks.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Back
Top