Confusing index notation involving grad of w cross r

troytroy
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



consider the position vector expressed in terms of its cartesian components, r=xiei. Let w=wjej be a fixed vector whose components wj are constants that do not depend on the xi, so that δwj/δxi = 0


Homework Equations



I am trying to evaluate ∇((wXr)^2)



The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
troytroy said:

Homework Statement



consider the position vector expressed in terms of its cartesian components, r=xiei. Let w=wjej be a fixed vector whose components wj are constants that do not depend on the xi, so that δwj/δxi = 0


Homework Equations



I am trying to evaluate ∇((wXr)^2)



The Attempt at a Solution


Hi troytroy, welcome to PF!:smile:

What have you tried and where are you stuck?
 
I am getting confused on where to begin when using index notation for these kind of problems
 
troytroy said:
I am getting confused on where to begin when using index notation for these kind of problems

Well, here you are being asked to calulate the gradient of some scalar function, so a good place to start would be to look up the expression for the gradient of a general scalar function f in index notation. What is that?

Next consider that in this case, the scalar function in question is the scalar product of of a vector with itself, (\mathbf{w}\times\mathbf{r})^2 (the norm-squared of a vector is usually written as ||\mathbf{v}||^2, but some authors will use more clumsy notation and just call it \mathbf{v}^2. Either way the norm-squared of a vector is given by the scalar product of a vector with itself). So, how do you express the scalar product of a vector with itself in index notation?

Finally, consider that the vector whose norm-square you are taking the gradient of is, in this case, the cross product of a vector with another vector, \mathbf{w}\times\mathbf{r}. How do you represent a cross product like this in index notation?
 
##|\Psi|^2=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\exp(\frac{-(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##\braket{x}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dx\,x\exp(-\frac{(x-x_0)^2}{b^2}).## ##y=x-x_0 \quad x=y+x_0 \quad dy=dx.## The boundaries remain infinite, I believe. ##\frac{1}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}dy(y+x_0)\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2}).## ##\frac{2}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,y\exp(\frac{-y^2}{b^2})+\frac{2x_0}{\sqrt{\pi b^2}}\int_0^{\infty}dy\,\exp(-\frac{y^2}{b^2}).## I then resolved the two...
Hello everyone, I’m considering a point charge q that oscillates harmonically about the origin along the z-axis, e.g. $$z_{q}(t)= A\sin(wt)$$ In a strongly simplified / quasi-instantaneous approximation I ignore retardation and take the electric field at the position ##r=(x,y,z)## simply to be the “Coulomb field at the charge’s instantaneous position”: $$E(r,t)=\frac{q}{4\pi\varepsilon_{0}}\frac{r-r_{q}(t)}{||r-r_{q}(t)||^{3}}$$ with $$r_{q}(t)=(0,0,z_{q}(t))$$ (I’m aware this isn’t...
It's given a gas of particles all identical which has T fixed and spin S. Let's ##g(\epsilon)## the density of orbital states and ##g(\epsilon) = g_0## for ##\forall \epsilon \in [\epsilon_0, \epsilon_1]##, zero otherwise. How to compute the number of accessible quantum states of one particle? This is my attempt, and I suspect that is not good. Let S=0 and then bosons in a system. Simply, if we have the density of orbitals we have to integrate ##g(\epsilon)## and we have...

Similar threads

Back
Top