Confusing Question: How Long Does it Take for a Racer to Travel 2(3.70)m?

  • Thread starter Thread starter unstoppy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing
AI Thread Summary
A racer traveling 3.70 meters in one second raises the question of how long it takes to cover 2(3.70) meters. The initial assumption of 2 seconds is challenged by the book's suggestion of the square root of 2 as the correct answer. The discussion hints at the need for clarification regarding whether the racer is moving at a constant velocity or experiencing uniform acceleration. It is emphasized that the context of the motion significantly impacts the calculation. Understanding the conditions of the racer's movement is crucial for determining the correct time.
unstoppy
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
If a racer travels 3.70m in one second. How long does it take for the racer to travel 2(3.70)m?

I was expecting 2s as the result but the book suggests square root of 2 to be the answer. I don't know why? Can anyone help me please.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
unstoppy said:
If a racer travels 3.70m in one second. How long does it take for the racer to travel 2(3.70)m?

I was expecting 2s as the result but the book suggests square root of 2 to be the answer. I don't know why? Can anyone help me please.

Welcome to the PF.

Is the racer accelerating? What is the exact quote from the book?
 
Thank you! That's all the information given on the book. I suppose he's moving inthe constant velocity
 
I can only suggest you double check that you have quoted the question word for word as given in the book.
 
triple checked ;p
 
unstoppy said:
I suppose he's moving inthe constant velocity
That won't work.

Assume uniform acceleration starting from rest.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top