A Confusion about Derivation of Vacuum Rabi Rate

Twigg
Science Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
893
Reaction score
483
Hi all,

I am learning about the vacuum Rabi frequency for the first time in Metcalf's book Laser Cooling and Trapping (Section 2.2). I am trying to make sense of the following two equations Metcalf gives:
$$\hbar \Omega_{S} = -\vec{\mu} \cdot \vec{E_{\omega}}$$ and $$\vec{E_{\omega}} = \sqrt{\frac{\hbar\omega}{2\epsilon_{0}V}}\vec{\epsilon}$$ where ##\Omega_{S}## is the vacuum Rabi frequency for the mode ##S = | \vec{k}, \vec{\epsilon} \rangle##, ##\mu## is the dipole moment of a two-level atom, and ##\vec{E_{\omega}}## is the "electric field per mode".

I see that the expression for ##\vec{E_{\omega}}## is obtained from setting the energy of the field equal to the zero-point energy of the radiation field: $$ \epsilon_{0} E_{\omega}^{2} V = \frac{1}{2} \hbar \omega$$
However, I am confused why ##E_{\omega}## is the vacuum-state field in this case. If I'm not mistaken, this field is the expected value of the electric field per mode for the vacuum state: ##\langle 0 | \vec{E_{\omega}} | 0 \rangle##, since it has the same energy per mode as the vacuum state. On the other hand, the Rabi rate is typically an off-diagonal element of the interaction Hamiltonian. So why isn't the first equation ##\hbar \Omega_{S} = -\vec{\mu} \cdot \langle 1_{S} | \vec{E} | 0 \rangle##?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I came up with a possible solution. I believe the key lies in where the electric field is being evaluated. The field of a photon emitted spontaneously will propagate away from the atom, so while there may be a photon in the radiation field, the field near the atom is still the expected field of the ground state. Am I on the right track?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top