Confusion about light exerting a force

AI Thread Summary
Light exerts a force due to its momentum, which is crucial for concepts like solar sails. While light is often described as massless, photons possess energy that can be related to mass through E = mc^2, indicating that energy and mass are interconnected. The discussion clarifies that photons are never at rest, making the concept of rest mass irrelevant. Additionally, the idea that energy influences weight is supported by the principle that increased thermal energy in an object correlates with a slight increase in mass. Overall, understanding the relationship between energy, mass, and momentum is essential in grasping how light can exert force.
pigtwo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone!

I've been thinking about this for a little while and haven't been able to come up with a satisfying answer yet, so I'm asking you guys.

I've heard about things like solar sails, where the light from the sun would be used to push something to somewhere. I also heard something where someone calculated the weight that light from the sun has on an area the size of LA(it was something like 9 lbs). Seeing how light is massless, I don't see how this is possible.

I know the sun ejects actual non-massless(massful?) particles that I guess you could say accounts for this but I don't think this is what they are talking about.

The only thing I could think of that could cause this is that light has some amount of energy and given E = mc^2, we could replace all the mass terms with terms of energy. So we would take

<br /> F = ma<br />
and turn it into
<br /> F = \frac{E}{c^2} a<br />

Is this correct? For some reason it feels like I'm missing something.

Also, just so you know, I'm an engineering undergrad so I don't know a ton of physics. I've only taken Physics I and II. So mechanics and basic electromagnetics.

Another mini-semi related question:
I've also heard that something with more energy actually weighs more than the same thing with less energy. So a cup of water at 100 degrees would weigh more than the identical cup at 1 degree.

Which I guess makes sense because of E = mc^2. But I don't see why it would actually gain mass. To me E = mc^2 is just saying that energy and matter are two forms of the same thing essentially, but not that if one increases the other also increases.

So in this case I could see how if you somehow converted the thermal energy to mass, it would then clearly weigh more. But until then, it would weigh the same but have more thermal energy.

I hope that made sense.
 
Science news on Phys.org
Start with the fact that light carries momentum. That will get you where you are going.
 
"I know the sun ejects actual non-massless(massful?) particles that I guess you could say accounts for this but I don't think this is what they are talking about."

True, the sun ocassionally emits gasses and particles called Coronal Mass Ejections. You are correct; these have nothing to do with "solar sails".

Cheers,
Bobbywhy
 
Last edited:
pigtwo said:
...To me E = mc^2 is just saying that energy and matter are two forms of the same thing essentially...

Right there you answered both of your own questions. Mass and energy are already the same thing. You don't have to convert one to the other. When you weigh something you are measuring its energy content.

Photons are said to be massless but that is not actually the case. What is meant by that is that they have no mass when at rest. However, they can never be at rest. Photons, by definition, travel at the speed of light so saying that the rest mass of a photon is pretty nonsensical.
 
Thread 'A quartet of epi-illumination methods'
Well, it took almost 20 years (!!!), but I finally obtained a set of epi-phase microscope objectives (Zeiss). The principles of epi-phase contrast is nearly identical to transillumination phase contrast, but the phase ring is a 1/8 wave retarder rather than a 1/4 wave retarder (because with epi-illumination, the light passes through the ring twice). This method was popular only for a very short period of time before epi-DIC (differential interference contrast) became widely available. So...
I am currently undertaking a research internship where I am modelling the heating of silicon wafers with a 515 nm femtosecond laser. In order to increase the absorption of the laser into the oxide layer on top of the wafer it was suggested we use gold nanoparticles. I was tasked with modelling the optical properties of a 5nm gold nanoparticle, in particular the absorption cross section, using COMSOL Multiphysics. My model seems to be getting correct values for the absorption coefficient and...
After my surgery this year, gas remained in my eye for a while. The light air bubbles appeared to sink to the bottom, and I realized that the brain was processing the information to invert the up/down/left/right image transferred to the retina. I have a question about optics and ophthalmology. Does the inversion of the image transferred to the retina depend on the position of the intraocular focal point of the lens of the eye? For example, in people with farsightedness, the focal point is...
Back
Top