Confusion about the boundary of a simple set

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining the boundary of the set defined by the inequality 0 < |z - z0| < 2. The book's solution incorrectly states that the boundary includes the point (0,0) along with the circle |z - z0| = 2. Participants clarify that the correct boundary should only include the circle and not the center point z0, as the inequality excludes points on the circle and the center itself. The confusion is acknowledged as a potential typo in the book's answer. Understanding these concepts is essential for accurately determining boundaries in mathematical sets.
Nathanael
Homework Helper
Messages
1,650
Reaction score
246

Homework Statement



Determine the boundary of the following set. As usual, z=(x,y).

0&lt;\left| z-z_0 \right|&lt;2

2. The attempt at a solution

The book's solution says "The circle \left| z-z_0 \right|=2 together with the point (0,0)"

Why should the answer not be "... together with the point z_0"?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nathanael said:

Homework Statement



Determine the boundary of the following set. As usual, z=(x,y).

0&lt;\left| z-z_0 \right|&lt;2

2. The attempt at a solution

The book's solution says "The circle \left| z-z_0 \right|=2 together with the point (0,0)"

Why should the answer not be "... together with the point z_0"?
The book's answer seems incorrect to me. The original inequality represents all of the points inside (but not on) the circle of radius 2 with center at z0, not including this center point.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Nathanael said:

Homework Statement



Determine the boundary of the following set. As usual, z=(x,y).

0&lt;\left| z-z_0 \right|&lt;2

2. The attempt at a solution

The book's solution says "The circle \left| z-z_0 \right|=2 together with the point (0,0)"

Why should the answer not be "... together with the point z_0"?
Yes, that was clearly a typo.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you both, it's my first time learning these ideas (even if they are fairly simple) so I just wanted to make sure I wasn't misunderstanding.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top