- #1
Imolopa
- 21
- 1
I've been given the following relations where as I understand it subindex 2 equals subindex e and subindex 1 equals subindex i:
***EDIT***
More accurately
subindex 1; initial state of a control mass
subindex 2: end state of a control mass (end state is simply state 2 in the problem at hand)
subindex CV for work W and heat Q denotes what work W and work Q passes through the boundaries of what is defined as the control volume CV in the situation.
***END EDIT***u2 = he
and
u 1 = h i
Relation 1:
1(Q - W)2 = 1Q2 -1W2 = m [ {u2 - u1 } + ( 1/2 ) * [ { v 2 2 } - { v 1 2 } ] + g {Z2 - Z1} ]Relation 2:
(Q - W)CV = QCV - WCV = ∑ m e [ ( he + ( 1/2 ) * { v e 2 } + gZe ] - ∑ m i [ ( hi + ( 1/2 ) * { v i 2 } + gZi ]Now in thermodynamic tables we have different columns for internal energy u and enthalpy h with different values, iow. h and u are different for the same state..
However the above relations seem to contradict the previous statement:
So what is correct? And what is happening here?
***EDIT***
More accurately
subindex 1; initial state of a control mass
subindex 2: end state of a control mass (end state is simply state 2 in the problem at hand)
subindex CV for work W and heat Q denotes what work W and work Q passes through the boundaries of what is defined as the control volume CV in the situation.
***END EDIT***u2 = he
and
u 1 = h i
Relation 1:
1(Q - W)2 = 1Q2 -1W2 = m [ {u2 - u1 } + ( 1/2 ) * [ { v 2 2 } - { v 1 2 } ] + g {Z2 - Z1} ]Relation 2:
(Q - W)CV = QCV - WCV = ∑ m e [ ( he + ( 1/2 ) * { v e 2 } + gZe ] - ∑ m i [ ( hi + ( 1/2 ) * { v i 2 } + gZi ]Now in thermodynamic tables we have different columns for internal energy u and enthalpy h with different values, iow. h and u are different for the same state..
However the above relations seem to contradict the previous statement:
So what is correct? And what is happening here?
Last edited: