Confusion with Calculating Centroid and Center of Mass for a Cone

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WiFO215
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sort
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the centroid and center of mass for a cone, specifically addressing the discrepancies encountered when substituting variables in the integrals used for these calculations. The scope includes mathematical reasoning and technical explanation related to the geometry of the cone.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Anirudh expresses confusion over obtaining different results when calculating the centroid of a cone using two different substitutions in the integral.
  • Some participants suggest that Anirudh may have incorrect limits for the integrals used in the calculations.
  • It is noted that the integrals for \( r^2 \) and \( z^2 \) are fundamentally different, as \( z^2 = r^2 \) holds only on the boundary of the cone, not throughout the volume.
  • A participant emphasizes that one cannot simply transform away \( r \, dr \) in the integrals, indicating a misunderstanding in the integration process.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to the integrals, and there remains uncertainty regarding the limits and substitutions used in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include potential misunderstandings of the geometric relationships within the cone and the implications of variable substitutions in the context of volume integrals.

WiFO215
Messages
417
Reaction score
1
NOTE: THIS IS NOT A HW PROBLEM
While calculating the moment of inertia of a cone, I made a mistake and got confused. Although I juggled the numbers and got the right answer, I have a doubt.

Say I have to calculate the centroid of a cone z2 = r2.

0 < z < h

It is quite obvious that the x and y co-ordinates of the centroid are zero. As for the z co-ordinate it can be calculated as follows:

[tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex][tex]_{V}[/tex] r2 dV =

[tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex][tex]_{V}[/tex] r2 r dr d[tex]\Theta[/tex] dz =

[tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex][tex]_{V}[/tex] r3 dr d[tex]\Theta[/tex] dz = [tex]\Pi[/tex]h5/10

But instead, in step 2 if I substituted r = z (from the equation of the cone), I get a completely different answer.

[tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex][tex]_{V}[/tex] z2 z dr d[tex]\Theta[/tex] dz =

[tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex][tex]_{V}[/tex] z3 dr d[tex]\Theta[/tex] dz = 2[tex]\Pi[/tex]h5/5

I got a similar doubt while calculating the center of mass, wherein I plugged in z = r in the equation and got a different (and wrong) answer.

Shouldn't I get the same answer either way? Why don't I get it?

Anirudh
 
Physics news on Phys.org
anirudh215 said:
Shouldn't I get the same answer either way? Why don't I get it?

Hi Anirudh! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and a pi: π :wink:)

You've probably got the limits wrong …

what limits did you use?
 
tiny-tim said:
have a theta: θ and a pi: π

:smile:

For the first one I used:

[tex]\int[/tex][tex]^{2\Pi}_{\Theta = 0}[/tex][tex]\int[/tex][tex]^{h}_{z = 0}[/tex][tex]\int[/tex][tex]^{z}_{r = 0}[/tex] r3 dr d[tex]\Theta[/tex] dz

For the second one I used:[tex]\int[/tex][tex]^{2\Pi}_{\Theta = 0}[/tex][tex]\int[/tex][tex]^{h}_{z = 0}[/tex][tex]\int[/tex][tex]^{z}_{z = 0}[/tex] z3 dr d[tex]\Theta[/tex] dz

I used the same limits because r = z. Is that wrong? (Obviously, it MUST be as the answer isn't right)
 
hmm … looking again, these are different integrals …
anirudh215 said:
[tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex][tex]_{V}[/tex] r2 r dr d[tex]\Theta[/tex] dz =

[tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex] [tex]\int[/tex][tex]_{V}[/tex] z2 z dr d[tex]\Theta[/tex] dz = …


∫∫∫ r2 is not the same as ∫∫∫ z2

z2 = r2 only on the boundary, not everywhere in the middle …

(and you can't transform away r dr anyway)
 
tiny-tim said:
(and you can't transform away r dr anyway)

Okay I understood that r = z only on the boundary. What does the above statement mean though?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K