Confusion with the centrifugal foce and potential energy

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concept of centrifugal potential energy in rotating systems, exploring how this energy is recovered when releasing rotating objects. Participants examine the differences between gravitational potential energy, elastic potential energy from springs, and centrifugal potential energy, considering both rotating and inertial frames of reference.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that when a rotating object is released, centrifugal potential energy is converted into kinetic energy in the rotating frame, while in an inertial frame, the object moves at constant speed without gaining kinetic energy.
  • Another participant imagines a scenario involving a hammer throw, suggesting that the spring's elastic energy is harvested as the weight moves in the centrifugal potential during the release.
  • A different perspective is offered regarding a mass on a string in a rotating space station, where releasing the mass could theoretically harvest centrifugal potential energy, but raises questions about energy sources when viewed from a non-rotating frame.
  • One participant proposes that the energy harvested in the rotating frame must come from the rotation of the space station, indicating a need to reconcile the different frames of reference.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the nature and recovery of centrifugal potential energy, with no consensus reached on how it operates across different frames of reference.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about the definitions of centrifugal potential energy and the frames of reference, which may not be fully resolved. The integration of centrifugal force to recover potential energy is mentioned but not detailed.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those exploring concepts in mechanics, particularly in rotating systems, as well as individuals curious about the implications of different frames of reference in energy conservation scenarios.

tolove
Messages
164
Reaction score
1
When we release a suspended object, we recover the potential energy due to gravity as the object travels back through the height raised.

When we release an extended spring, we recover the potential energy as the object travels back through the distance stretched.

But when we release a rotating object, how is the centrifugal potential energy recovered?

I know that if we integrate the centrifugal force over the radius, we can numerically recover the potential, but I still feel as if I am missing something.

Thank you for your time!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
tolove said:
But when we release a rotating object, how is the centrifugal potential energy recovered?
Centrifugal force and centrifugal potential energy exist only in a rotating frame of reference. If you release on object that was initially at rest in the rotating frame, it will gain speed in the rotating frame, converting centrifugal potential energy into kinetic energy.

In the inertial frame it's of course just moving at constant speed, not gaining any kinetic energy.
 
Hi. 
I imagined your case hammer throw with chain replaced by spring.  Spring is extended by rotation of the player. When he releases the hammer, weight and spring make vibration.  Spring gets elastic energy by downing weight in centrifugal potential. Spring elastic energy convert to vibration energy by the release.
 
Last edited:
The scenario I imagine is different. Possibly we need to ask OP to clarify things.

Suppose that you are standing on the floor of a rotating space station. You have a mass on a string and allow it to drop from table to floor while harvesting the energy as the string pays out. For a 1 kg object dropping 1 meter under 1 g of artificial gravity you could harvest ~10 Joules of centrifugal potential energy in this manner. You could use this to partially recharge a battery.

But if one adopts a non-rotating frame of reference and looks at the same scenario, there is a conundrum. There is no centrifugal potential to harvest. 10 Joules of energy went into charging a battery. The object moved 1 meter farther from the center of rotation and ended with more kinetic energy than it started. Where did the energy come from?

It came from the rotation of the space station. We can walk through the details that reconcile the two points of view if OP is interested.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
11K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K