Congruence: Solving Let p be a Prime Number

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bhatia
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the congruence relation \(x^d \equiv 1 \mod p\) where \(p\) is a prime number and \(d\) is a divisor of \(p-1\). Participants analyze the number of incongruent solutions to this equation, concluding that there are exactly \(d\) incongruent solutions when \(d\) divides \(p-1\). The example with \(p = 5\) illustrates that for \(d = 1, 2, 4\), the solutions are \(x = 1\), \(x = 1, 4\), and \(x = 1, 2, 3, 4\) respectively, confirming the assertion of exactly \(d\) solutions. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding group theory to fully grasp the implications of these congruences.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of modular arithmetic
  • Familiarity with prime numbers and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of group theory
  • Experience with congruences and divisors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of prime numbers and their role in modular arithmetic
  • Learn about the structure of multiplicative groups modulo \(p\)
  • Explore the concept of Euler's theorem and its applications
  • Investigate the relationship between divisors of \(p-1\) and the number of solutions to congruences
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of number theory, and anyone interested in the applications of modular arithmetic and group theory in solving congruences.

Bhatia
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Let p be a prime number and d / p-1 .

Then which of the following statements about the congruence?
x ^d = 1( mod p) is / are correct :
1. It does not have a solution
2 atmost d incongurent solutions
3 exactly d incongruent solutions
4 aleast d incongruent solutions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Bhatia! :smile:

What do you think? And why?

(maybe try to work it out for a concrete example of p and d? Like p=11 and d=5?)
 
micromass said:
Hi Bhatia! :smile:

What do you think? And why?

(maybe try to work it out for a concrete example of p and d? Like p=11 and d=5?)

Thanks for your reply :smile:

Going by your idea

Let p= 5, then since d / p-1 then I guess we have d= 1, 2, 4...then solving x^ d = 1 (mod 5)

for d=1, x=1
for d=2, x= 4, 6,9,11,14, ...
for d=4, x= 2, 3,4,6, 7 ...

So I am thinking atleast d...

But not sure...I did not study number theory at graduation level.
 
Bhatia said:
Thanks for your reply :smile:

Going by your idea

Let p= 5, then since d / p-1 then I guess we have d= 1, 2, 4...then solving x^ d = 1 (mod 5)

for d=1, x=1
for d=2, x= 4, 6,9,11,14, ...
for d=4, x= 2, 3,4,6, 7 ...

You're working (mod 5) here, so I suggest that you express the x also in (mod 5). (thus x can be 0,1,2,3 or 4).
When I do this, I get

for d=1: x=1
for d=2: x=1,4
for d=4: x=1,2,3,4

Solutions like 9 are superfluous here, since 9=4 (mod 5).

So I am thinking atleast d...

This is certainly correct, but the above example suggest exactly d!

To prove this consider a number a coprime with p (for example take a=2 when p is odd). Then what can you say about

a^{\frac{p-1}{d}}By the way, do you know some group theory? It would make it a lot easier...
 
micromass said:
You're working (mod 5) here, so I suggest that you express the x also in (mod 5). (thus x can be 0,1,2,3 or 4).
When I do this, I get

for d=1: x=1
for d=2: x=1,4
for d=4: x=1,2,3,4

Solutions like 9 are superfluous here, since 9=4 (mod 5).

This is certainly correct, but the above example suggest exactly d!

To prove this consider a number a coprime with p (for example take a=2 when p is odd). Then what can you say about

a^{\frac{p-1}{d}}By the way, do you know some group theory? It would make it a lot easier...
Thank you so much...

I agree with this...I realized my mistake x should be strictly less than p.

Taking p to be odd (as suggested) p= 5 , then d =1, 2, 3, 4.

Does 2 ^ (p-1)/d imply the following we get:

for d=1, 2^ 4 = 16 works for d=1 that is , 16= 1 (mod 5).
for d=2, 2 ^ 2= 4 works for d=2 that is, 4^2 = 1( mod 5)
for d= 4, 2 ^ 1 =2 works for d =4, that is , 2^ 4 = 1 (mod 5).

Does this mean that we can generate other values of x ( above we get x= 16)...so x has to be at least d but can be more than d as well.

Please help !
 
Last edited:
9 is not prime.
 
Thanks, Yuqing.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K