The uncertainty relation are due to the non-commuting nature of those variables. If you know how to derive HUP for x and p, it is straight forward to do it for several other pairs of conjugate variables/operators.
Given a lagrangian L(q,\dot q), the conjugate momentum to q is p=\partial L/\partial\dot q. There is an uncertainty relation between canonically conjugate variables because that's what quantum mechanics says, and quantum mechanics has been verified by tens of thousands of experiments (at least) to date.
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles.
Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated...
Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/
by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
I don't know why the electrons in atoms are considered in the orbitals while they could be in sates which are superpositions of these orbitals? If electrons are in the superposition of these orbitals their energy expectation value is also constant, and the atom seems to be stable!