Conjunction of Sets: x,y in Rm+n vs Vector z in R(m+n)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter krcmd1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sets
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between ordered pairs (x, y) in R^(m+n) and vectors z in R^(m+n). It concludes that there is no difference in connotation between these notations, as they are isomorphic. For every vector z, there exists a unique corresponding pair (x, y) and vice versa. The distinction between R^(m+n) and R^((m+n)) is questioned, with the latter notation being unfamiliar to participants.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of set theory and notation in mathematics
  • Familiarity with vector spaces and their properties
  • Knowledge of isomorphism in mathematical contexts
  • Basic comprehension of real number spaces R^n
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the concept of isomorphism in vector spaces
  • Explore the properties of Cartesian products in set theory
  • Learn about the notation and implications of R^n in mathematical literature
  • Investigate the differences between various notational conventions in mathematics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of linear algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of vector spaces and set theory.

krcmd1
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
If x \epsilon A \subset R\overline{}n and y \epsilon B \subset R\overline{}m,

then A X B \subset R\overline{}m+n.

Is there any difference between the connotation of (x,y) \epsilon R\overline{}m+n and a vector z in R\overline{}(m+n)?

thanks!

(can't get the (m+n) above the line yet)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
the short answer is no. But this is because when the notation is like that, it is clearly isomorphic. That is to every z there is a unique (x,y) and the other way around.

Don't know why you distinguish between R^{m+n} and R^{(m+n)}, have never seen that notation.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K