Connect a antenna with 75Ω line impedance to VNA

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around connecting a 75Ω antenna to a Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) with a 50Ω input impedance. Participants explore various methods for impedance matching, including the use of baluns and other matching schemes, while considering the specific frequency range of the antenna and the implications for measurement accuracy.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest using a balun or other matching scheme to connect the 75Ω antenna to the 50Ω VNA, questioning what type of antenna and frequency range are involved.
  • One participant mentions that a half-wave dipole antenna operates in the frequency range of approximately 2.4GHz to 2.5GHz and inquires about making a balun with standard components.
  • Another participant notes that while a balun is typically used for converting balanced to unbalanced signals, it may not be a matching device.
  • Concerns are raised about the mismatch and its effect on measurements, with some suggesting that reflected power may not significantly impact results if the mismatch is not severe.
  • Participants discuss the possibility of using a quarter wave impedance transformer made from FR4 board as an alternative matching solution.
  • There are suggestions to use a two-component matching network designed with a Smith chart, although this approach is noted to be fragile.
  • One participant emphasizes the importance of using the correct connectors and warns against connecting 75Ω cables directly to 50Ω systems without appropriate adapters.
  • Some participants express that a 1.5 SWR is acceptable for many applications, while others suggest that proper calibration with a 75Ω kit is ideal but may be difficult to obtain.
  • There are mentions of DIY calibration kits and the potential for rough measurements without precise matching, although this may lead to inaccuracies.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best method for connecting the antenna to the VNA, with multiple competing views on the effectiveness of various matching techniques and the implications of impedance mismatch for measurement accuracy.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations regarding the availability of 75Ω calibration kits and the challenges of DIY solutions, as well as the potential inaccuracies that may arise from using non-standard matching networks.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for individuals working with RF applications, antenna design, or those seeking to understand impedance matching in the context of network analysis.

N468989
Messages
92
Reaction score
0
Connect an antenna with 75Ω line impedance to VNA

Hello, how can i connect an antenna with 75Ω line impedance if vna has 50Ω input impedance.

thanks
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
N468989 said:
Hello, how can i connect an antenna with 75Ω line impedance if vna has 50Ω input impedance.

thanks

The traditional way is with a balun or other matching scheme. What frequency range? What type of antenna? Pointer to the VNA spec?
 
It's a half-wave dipole antenna, the frequency range is aprox 2.4Ghz to 2.5 Ghz. The VNA don't know which one yet.

For the balun can make one with normal components?

What other matching schemes could i do?

thanks for your help
 
Since you need to also do the Balanced-Unbalanced translation (dipole-to-coax), the balun would be the way you'd normally do that. There are plenty of commercially available parts for that ISM band. I did a google search for ism band balun, and got lots of good hits. Here's a nice paper:

http://www.rfdesignline.com/howto/197006085

You can also make baluns with lengths of coax, as shown for a specialized ISM antanna in this article:

http://pe2er.nl/wifisector/

The ARRL Antenna Books also show different ways to make baluns for dipole antennas.
 
That is not a bad match actually. SWR is 1.5. Many systems work on a SWR up to 2 so I wouldn't worry bother matching any closer.

Baluns are for converting balanced to unbalanced and not really matching devices.

(40+ years experience in radio including broadcasting, military and mobile phones)
 
What are you trying to measure? For most measurements the mismatch shouldn't be too much of a problem; most of the the reflected power will be absorbed inside the VNA to standing waves etc shouldn't be too much of a problem.
The "proper" way of doing this is to set the characteristic impedance to 75 Ohm in the calibration menus of the VNA and then use a 75 Ohm calibration kit. However, these are rare and quite expensive.

You could try de-embedding the DUT using a pad, but that is quite tricky; at least if you need an accurate measurement.

Also, be careful when you connect your device to the VNA; 75 Ohm connectors DO NOT FIT on 50 ohm systems; you MUST use an adapter (or a minimum loss pad or something similar) or you WILL destroy the connectors on the VNA.
 
N468989 said:
It's a half-wave dipole antenna, the frequency range is aprox 2.4Ghz to 2.5 Ghz. The VNA don't know which one yet.

For the balun can make one with normal components?

What other matching schemes could i do?

thanks for your help

Buy one if you can. Nothing is simple dealing with RF!

You can always make a quarter wave impedance transformer. Fab it out of a 2 sided FR4 ground plane boards. Edge out a microstrip of quater wave length at 2.45Ghz. The impedance should be [tex]\sqrt{75X50}[/tex] which come out to be 61.2ohm. Look up the wave length on FR4. find the dielectric thickness and look up the width of the trace. The length should be about .6 inches or so?? small enough to do it in a small board. You can then use the VNA to de embard and match. That is if you want to do it as a charllenge! Buy one if you can!
 
I will measure the resturn loss (S11) for example. How can i adapt the line impedance for the VNA (i.e build a circuit)?

If i fit a 50Ω conector on the 75Ω cable will it be ok or are there any problems?


yungman said:
Buy one if you can. Nothing is simple dealing with RF!

You can always make a quarter wave impedance transformer. Fab it out of a 2 sided FR4 ground plane boards. Edge out a microstrip of quater wave length at 2.45Ghz. The impedance should be [tex]\sqrt{75X50}[/tex] which come out to be 61.2ohm. Look up the wave length on FR4. find the dielectric thickness and look up the width of the trace. The length should be about .6 inches or so?? small enough to do it in a small board. You can then use the VNA to de embard and match. That is if you want to do it as a charllenge! Buy one if you can!

so if i buy a balun for 75Ω->50Ω I'm ok?

I understand what you mean but that may be a bit to difficult to make that. i will search that also!

thankyou
 
N468989 said:
I will measure the resturn loss (S11) for example. How can i adapt the line impedance for the VNA (i.e build a circuit)?

If i fit a 50Ω conector on the 75Ω cable will it be ok or are there any problems?




so if i buy a balun for 75Ω->50Ω I'm ok?

I understand what you mean but that may be a bit to difficult to make that. i will search that also!

thankyou


If you really want something NOW. You can always use a two components matching. Use Smith chart to design. You have to use surface mount cap and inductor. This kind is the fastest and easiest to build but is very fragile, you bend the coax and you break the component easily. You need help using smith chart? Also you need to deal with double end to single end. But the circuit board is so small, I think you just do it and it will be fine!

Yes buying one is the way to go in the long run.
 
  • #10
f95toli said:
What are you trying to measure? For most measurements the mismatch shouldn't be too much of a problem; most of the the reflected power will be absorbed inside the VNA to standing waves etc shouldn't be too much of a problem.
The "proper" way of doing this is to set the characteristic impedance to 75 Ohm in the calibration menus of the VNA and then use a 75 Ohm calibration kit. However, these are rare and quite expensive.

You could try de-embedding the DUT using a pad, but that is quite tricky; at least if you need an accurate measurement.

Also, be careful when you connect your device to the VNA; 75 Ohm connectors DO NOT FIT on 50 ohm systems; you MUST use an adapter (or a minimum loss pad or something similar) or you WILL destroy the connectors on the VNA.


I second f95toli's suggestion.
 
  • #11
Pumblechook said:
That is not a bad match actually. SWR is 1.5. Many systems work on a SWR up to 2 so I wouldn't worry bother matching any closer.

Baluns are for converting balanced to unbalanced and not really matching devices.

(40+ years experience in radio including broadcasting, military and mobile phones)

this is good advice thanks! i will check this.


f95toli said:
Also, be careful when you connect your device to the VNA; 75 Ohm connectors DO NOT FIT on 50 ohm systems; you MUST use an adapter (or a minimum loss pad or something similar) or you WILL destroy the connectors on the VNA.

Yes of course i will use the right BNC connectors. But is it ok to connect the 75 Ohm cable to the VNA? Pumblechook stated that SWR is 1.5 so it's ok.
 
  • #12
N468989 said:
Yes of course i will use the right BNC connectors. But is it ok to connect the 75 Ohm cable to the VNA? Pumblechook stated that SWR is 1.5 so it's ok.

Well, the VNA won't care as long as you use 50 Ohm connectors. All VNAs can measure loads with whatever impedance you like (almost) and you will get accurate results as long as you calibrate them using a calibration kit of the right impedance; this is why you can set the characteristic impedance of your kit in the calibration menu. The fact that that VNAs have 50 Ohm connectors is mainly due to the fact that this is the most common impedance in high-frequency applications.

Hence, your problem is simply that you (presumably) only have access to a 50 ohm calibration kit; this is why you need e.g. a balun or some other matching network.

Note that if you are only interested "rough" results (e.g. seeing where the antenna radiates the most) you might even be able to get away with a DIY calibration kit; i.e. make a 75 ohm load using a SMD resistor; the open and short are more problematic but you could always try just using a piece of open 75 ohm cable and a shorted one:-p , the reference planes won't be in the right place but I suspect this might still be more accurate than trying to build a DIY matching network; especially since you have no accurate way of de-embedding the latter.
But buying a balun or (better) borrowing a 75 ohm calibration kit from someone would be the best solution.
 
  • #13
this is the beast:
http://www.home.agilent.com/agilent/product.jspx?cc=US&lc=eng&nid=-536902643.761696.00&pageMode=OP

i am going to study the option, thanks all.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #14
Check your inbox.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K