Connected Spaces: Disjoint Unions & Inf Sets

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mikemaths
  • Start date Start date
Mikemaths
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Can a disconnected space be a disjoint union of two infinite sets?
Must the disjoint subspaces be finite?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the connected components need not be finite, nor do they have to be compact.
 
Mikemaths said:
Can a disconnected space be a disjoint union of two infinite sets?
Sure. E.g.T=[0,1]\cup [2,3]\subset\mathbb{R}.

Well, just take any two disjoint infinite open subsets of some topological space, then their union is by definition disconnected.
 
Landau wrote, in part:

" Well, just take any two disjoint infinite open subsets of some topological space, then their union is by definition disconnected."

I think we also need that the intersection of their closures is empty, e.g.,

(-oo,1)\/(1,oo) is not a disconnection of R, since 1 belongs to both their closures,

IOW, I think we need that the open sets have no limit point in common.
 
The reason it's not a disconnection of R is because neither has 1 in it, not because 1 is in both of their closures.

But this isn't really relevant, because (-\infty, 1) and (1, \infty) is a disjoint cover of the topological space \mathbb{R}-{1}
 
O.K, my bad: the actual statement should be that X is disconnected iff (def.)

X=A\/B , with ClA /\B =empty =A/\ClB , with \/ =union, /\ intersection, Cl=closure

and A, B subsets of X. And Landau was right.
 
Back
Top