Consecutive and minimum pair puzzle

AI Thread Summary
Two consecutive positive decimal integers can be found where the sum of the digits of each is divisible by 11. The minimum possible pair identified is 2899999 and 2900000. The analysis shows that for a number with n nines, the equation 9*n-1 must be divisible by 11, leading to n=5. The digit sum condition is satisfied with t+x+y+z equaling 10. This puzzle illustrates a unique relationship between digit sums and divisibility rules.
K Sengupta
Messages
113
Reaction score
0
Two consecutive positive decimal integers are such that the sum of the digits of each of them is divisible by 11.

Determine the minimum possible pair of such numbers.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Let the 2 numbers be:
t...x y z 99...9
and
t...x y (z+1) 00...0

Suppose n 9's.
Then 9*n-1 is divisible by 11.
So, n=5.
We know the first number is
t...x y z 99999
But t+...+x+y+z = 55-45=10. So, the numbers are
2899999 and 2900000

:smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top