MHB Consecutive vertical and horizontal transformations of a function

pluto1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear all,
I am stuck on this question:
"If f(x)=(2^x)+1, give in simplest terms the formula for h(x), which is obtained from transforming f(x) by

a vertical stretch, scale factor 8 relative to y=0
a translation by vector (1,4)
a horizontal stretch, scale factor 1/2 relative to x=0"

This is what I understand from the question:

A vertical stretch by scale factor 8 means h(x)= 8 f(x)
A translation by vector (1,4) means h(x)= f(x-1) + 4
A horizontal stretch by scale factor 1/2 means h(x)= f(1/2x)
Where the horizontal shift is applied prior to the horizontal stretch.

This gives me

h(x)= 8 ((2^(1/2 x-1) + 1/2 x - 1))+ 4
h(x)= 2^(2x-2) + 16 x - 4

h(x)=4^(x+1)+16x-4 according to the solutions at the back of my textbook. I would really appreciate some help. Thank you so much in advance.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
In what order are you doing these transformations?
 
I applied the horizontal changes before the vertical changes, with the translation by -1 prior to the stretch by 1/2

I just tried the opposite with all the vertical changes first but that does not give me the correct solution either
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top