Conservation Laws (Linear & Angulat Momentum)

AI Thread Summary
Identifying conserved components of linear and angular momentum can be challenging, particularly in complex systems like charged cylinders. Linear momentum is conserved in directions without applied forces, while angular momentum is conserved in directions without applied torques. A practical approach in electrostatics involves analyzing the potential of the system; directions lacking coordinate dependence indicate conservation of linear momentum. However, this method is limited to Cartesian coordinates and may not apply in curvilinear systems. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving momentum conservation problems effectively.
M. next
Messages
380
Reaction score
0
As we are being introduced to this new lesson, it gets difficult sometimes to indicate which component of either (linear or angular momentum) is conserved.
Is there a strict rule to help me indicate which is which? Hmm, if not, can you give me the logical way through it?

Thanks in advance,
M. next
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you give a specific example of what's confusing you?
 
Hmm, let's suppose we have an infinetly charged cylinder except a FINITE gap as in the photo.
But as in general, how do you think about it?
 

Attachments

  • physics.png
    physics.png
    1.2 KB · Views: 522
Sorry, but I don't see what your example has to do with conservation of momentum.
 
Doc Al,
As any problem, what components [linear or angular momentum ones] will stay conserved as a point charge moves in the field of a volume charged cylinder except the gap (see figure).

Thanks anyways.
 
Linear momentum will be conserved in the directions in which there aren't any applied forces, and angular momentum will be conserved in the directions in which there aren't any applied torques.

Here's a suggestion in the case of electrostatics: try writing down the potential for the system and inspecting it for dependency on the coordinates. Since (electrostatic) force is the gradient of the potential, the directions that conserve linear momentum will be the ones whose coordinates fail to appear in the potential. (Because if they did, there would be a nonzero derivative with respect to them, which means there would be a force in that direction.)

I should mention that a mathematician would scold me at this point: that suggestion won't work in curvilinear coordinates (cylindrical coordinates, say), so you'd have to use Cartesian coordinates in this case.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top